Glad to see consensus on this proposal.
This new subproject will hopefully continue Hadoop's evolution forward (dare I
say the biggest one since YARN) and also intends to accomplish this with
minimal project overhead.
+1 binding.
Thanks
+Vinod
> On Mar 20, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Owen O'Malley wr
Ok, with a lot of +1's, one +0, and no -1's the vote passes.
We have a new subproject!
We should resolve the final name and then create a jira instance for it.
Thanks everyone,
Owen
+1 for the sub-project idea. Thanks to everyone that contributed!
Regards,
Rakesh
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Jack Liu wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
>
> > +1(binding),
> >
> > - Tsuyoshi
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 14:21 Owen O
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
> +1(binding),
>
> - Tsuyoshi
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 14:21 Owen O'Malley
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch
> HDFS-7240
> > to trunk), I'd like to propose the
+1(binding),
- Tsuyoshi
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 14:21 Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
>
> Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
> to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
>
> * HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
> * HDSL will release separately from Hadoop
+1
Best,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Xiao Chen wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> -Xiao
>
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 9:07 PM, Akira Ajisaka
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Akira
>>
>>
>> On 2018/03/24 15:18, Lokesh Jain wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Lokesh
>>>
>>>
>>>
+1
Thanks,
-Xiao
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 9:07 PM, Akira Ajisaka
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
>
>
> On 2018/03/24 15:18, Lokesh Jain wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Lokesh
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hd
+1
Thanks,
Akira
On 2018/03/24 15:18, Lokesh Jain wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks
Lokesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
---
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks
Lokesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
+1 (binding)
Happy to see the community converge on a proposal.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> +1
>
> If this VOTE is to gather consensus about establishing a new subproject,
> let's definitely proceed with that.
>
> It sounds like we're already discussing changes to the
+1
If this VOTE is to gather consensus about establishing a new subproject,
let's definitely proceed with that.
It sounds like we're already discussing changes to the details of how the
project will be run, and releasing from the branch vs. maven profile is not
a blocker for me. I raised it since
+1 ( binding)
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Owen O'Malley
wrote:
> All,
>
> Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
> to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
>
> * HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
> * HDSL will release separately from Hadoop. Had
+1 (binding)
Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Owen O'Malley
wrote:
> All,
>
> Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
> to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
>
> * HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
> * HDSL will release separately from Hadoo
+1 for the subproject of HDSL
Instead of maintaining directly as part of main repo itself, may be we can
explore 'git submodules'
-Vinay
On 23 Mar 2018 11:47 am, "Takanobu Asanuma" wrote:
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
-Takanobu Asanuma
> All,
>
> Following our discussions on the previous threa
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
-Takanobu Asanuma
> All,
>
> Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
> to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
>
> * HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
> * HDSL will release separately from Hadoop. Hadoop releases will not
> c
+1 (non-binding)
On 3/23/18, 8:23 AM, "dujunp...@gmail.com on behalf of 俊平堵"
wrote:
I think the proposal here is the right way to get consensus from each part
of community. +1 (binding)
Thanks Owen for driving this.
Thanks,
Junping
2018-03-21 2:20 GM
I think the proposal here is the right way to get consensus from each part
of community. +1 (binding)
Thanks Owen for driving this.
Thanks,
Junping
2018-03-21 2:20 GMT+08:00 Owen O'Malley :
> All,
>
> Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
> to trunk), I'd l
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Chen
> On Mar 20, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
> to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
>
> * HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
> * HDSL will release separate
+1 (Binding)
Regards,
Suresh
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Owen O'Malley
wrote:
> All,
>
> Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
> to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
>
> * HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
> * HDSL will release separately fr
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Hanisha
On 3/22/18, 4:06 PM, "Elek, Marton" wrote:
>
> > We need to do this since the source tarball is our official Apache
>release
> > artifact, the rest are convenience binaries. So the Maven profile is
> > insufficient for this.
>
>It's a very good point, but a
> We need to do this since the source tarball is our official Apache
release
> artifact, the rest are convenience binaries. So the Maven profile is
> insufficient for this.
It's a very good point, but actually it could be handled with maven
profile and assembly descriptors. I created HDFS-133
Hi Lei/Owen,
Based on Daryn’s suggestion, we have made HDSL a loadable module inside data
node.
It relies on the current loadable module support that is already present in
HDFS.
This module is loaded by Datanodes only when it is configured.
--Anu
On 3/22/18, 11:25 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Lei Xu wrote:
>
> I have one concrete question about how this HDSL subproject being
> separated: Ozone / HDSL was designed in the current way to re-use the
> existing HDFS code base as much as possible, thus today for this
> container service is in DataNode itsel
Hi, Owen
Thanks a lot for this proposal, as I believe it has addressed most of
the concerns of the community.
I have one concrete question about how this HDSL subproject being
separated: Ozone / HDSL was designed in the current way to re-use the
existing HDFS code base as much as possible, thus t
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Andrew Wang wrote:
> We want the git hash to match the contents of the tarball and tag, which is
> beyond what create release does right now. It doesn't do any git stuff.
...and it can't? Even if this remains a manual step, it's not a
significant concession.
> I
We want the git hash to match the contents of the tarball and tag, which is
beyond what create release does right now. It doesn't do any git stuff.
Also sorry if I missed this, but have we gone through all of Owen and
Daryn's earlier comments about merge readiness? Some of Daryn's in
particular re
+1 (binding)
This compromise seems to address most of the concerns raised during
the discussion. Thanks for proposing and driving this, Owen.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Wang wrote:
> In Owen's proposal, it says to delete the module from the release branch.
> We need to do this since
Hi Anu,
Again apologies in advance for phone typing, flight delays means I'm still
writing this from an airport :(
In Owen's proposal, it says to delete the module from the release branch.
We need to do this since the source tarball is our official Apache release
artifact, the rest are convenienc
+1 (non binding)
Thanks,
Mukul
On 22/03/18, 12:31 PM, "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze"
wrote:
+1 (binding)
Tsz-Wo
On Wednesday, March 21, 2018, 10:38:03 PM PDT, Jakob Homan
wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 21 March 2018 at 20:12, Shashikant Banerjee
wrote:
> +1(
+1 (binding)
Tsz-Wo
On Wednesday, March 21, 2018, 10:38:03 PM PDT, Jakob Homan
wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 21 March 2018 at 20:12, Shashikant Banerjee
wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> On 3/21/18, 10:13 AM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 3/20/18, 8:39 PM, "Weiwei Yang"
+1 (binding)
On 21 March 2018 at 20:12, Shashikant Banerjee
wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> On 3/21/18, 10:13 AM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 3/20/18, 8:39 PM, "Weiwei Yang" wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
> I really like this proposal and thanks for all t
+1(non-binding)
On 3/21/18, 10:13 AM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 3/20/18, 8:39 PM, "Weiwei Yang" wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
I really like this proposal and thanks for all the discussions.
--
Weiwei
On 21 Mar
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Bharat
On 3/20/18, 11:21 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
All,
Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
* HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
* HDSL will release sep
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your comment.
>” Having to delete it each time means more work for mainline RMs and more room
>for error.”
The current change that we have done has a maven profile called “–Phdsl,"
without this flag it
will not be compiled and will not be included in source or binary pac
Hi folks,
Sorry for not replying earlier, I've been on vacation for the last week and
am writing this on my phone from the airport now. Please excuse me if this
is terser than my normal emails.
I really like the direction of Owen's proposal, thanks Owen for driving
this toward a conclusion accept
+1 (non-binding)
On 3/20/18, 9:43 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 3/20/18, 8:39 PM, "Weiwei Yang" wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
I really like this proposal and thanks for all the discussions.
--
Weiwei
On 21 Mar
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:34 PM, 郑锴(铁杰) wrote:
> >>* HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
> I'm not compfortable with the HDSL name, as Konstantin mentioned. H-DSL
> looks like a DSL language at the first glance.
>
Let's start a separate thread about the name. My general guidance on naming
things
+1 (binding)
On 3/20/18, 8:39 PM, "Weiwei Yang" wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
I really like this proposal and thanks for all the discussions.
--
Weiwei
On 21 Mar 2018, 8:39 AM +0800, Arpit Agarwal ,
wrote:
+1 (binding)
Arpit
On 3/20/18, 11:21 AM, "O
+1 (non-binding)
I really like this proposal and thanks for all the discussions.
--
Weiwei
On 21 Mar 2018, 8:39 AM +0800, Arpit Agarwal , wrote:
+1 (binding)
Arpit
On 3/20/18, 11:21 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
All,
Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
to
>enough to separate the dev, maintaince and release activities.
Regards,Kai
--发件人：Owen
O'Malley 发送时间：2018年3月21日(星期三) 02:21收件人：Hdfs-dev
主 题：[VOTE] Adopt HDSL as a new Hadoop subproject
All,
Following our discussions on the previ
+1 (binding)
Arpit
On 3/20/18, 11:21 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
All,
Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
* HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
* HDSL will release separately from
+1 (binding)
sanjay
> On Mar 20, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
> to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
>
> * HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
> * HDSL will release separately from Hadoo
+1 (Binding)
Xiaoyu
On 3/20/18, 11:53 AM, "Anu Engineer" wrote:
+1 (Binding)
--Anu
On 3/20/18, 11:21 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
All,
Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch
HDFS-7240
to trunk), I'd like
+1 (Binding)
--Anu
On 3/20/18, 11:21 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
All,
Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
* HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
* HDSL will release separately from
All,
Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
* HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
* HDSL will release separately from Hadoop. Hadoop releases will not
contain HDSL and vice versa.
* HDSL will get its own jira instan
45 matches
Mail list logo
