+1 (non-binding)

On 3/23/18, 8:23 AM, "dujunp...@gmail.com on behalf of 俊平堵" 
<dujunp...@gmail.com on behalf of junping...@apache.org> wrote:

    I think the proposal here is the right way to get consensus from each part
    of community. +1 (binding)
    Thanks Owen for driving this.
    
    
    Thanks,
    
    Junping
    
    2018-03-21 2:20 GMT+08:00 Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>:
    
    > All,
    >
    > Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch HDFS-7240
    > to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
    >
    > * HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
    > * HDSL will release separately from Hadoop. Hadoop releases will not
    > contain HDSL and vice versa.
    > * HDSL will get its own jira instance so that the release tags stay
    > separate.
    > * On trunk (as opposed to release branches) HDSL will be a separate module
    > in Hadoop's source tree. This will enable the HDSL to work on their trunk
    > and the Hadoop trunk without making releases for every change.
    > * Hadoop's trunk will only build HDSL if a non-default profile is enabled.
    > * When Hadoop creates a release branch, the RM will delete the HDSL module
    > from the branch.
    > * HDSL will have their own Yetus checks and won't cause failures in the
    > Hadoop patch check.
    >
    > I think this accomplishes most of the goals of encouraging HDSL 
development
    > while minimizing the potential for disruption of HDFS development.
    >
    > The vote will run the standard 7 days and requires a lazy 2/3 vote. PMC
    > votes are binding, but everyone is encouraged to vote.
    >
    > +1 (binding)
    >
    > .. Owen
    >
    


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to