+1 for the sub-project idea. Thanks to everyone that contributed!

Regards,
Rakesh

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Jack Liu <jack....@zoom.us> wrote:

>  +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1(binding),
> >
> > - Tsuyoshi
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 14:21 Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch
> > HDFS-7240
> > > to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
> > >
> > > * HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
> > > * HDSL will release separately from Hadoop. Hadoop releases will not
> > > contain HDSL and vice versa.
> > > * HDSL will get its own jira instance so that the release tags stay
> > > separate.
> > > * On trunk (as opposed to release branches) HDSL will be a separate
> > module
> > > in Hadoop's source tree. This will enable the HDSL to work on their
> trunk
> > > and the Hadoop trunk without making releases for every change.
> > > * Hadoop's trunk will only build HDSL if a non-default profile is
> > enabled.
> > > * When Hadoop creates a release branch, the RM will delete the HDSL
> > module
> > > from the branch.
> > > * HDSL will have their own Yetus checks and won't cause failures in the
> > > Hadoop patch check.
> > >
> > > I think this accomplishes most of the goals of encouraging HDSL
> > development
> > > while minimizing the potential for disruption of HDFS development.
> > >
> > > The vote will run the standard 7 days and requires a lazy 2/3 vote. PMC
> > > votes are binding, but everyone is encouraged to vote.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > .. Owen
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>

Reply via email to