Re: [Harbour] Decimal Arithmetic

2010-03-17 Thread Alex Strickland
Maurilio Longo wrote: here attachment with only my code, it is supposed to be put inside a folder with decNumber source code. BTW, I've found your link points to the same library :) It just changes domain name. That is a very nice piece of code. Thank you. To all Is there any interest in ad

Re: [Harbour] Decimal Arithmetic

2010-03-17 Thread Viktor Szakáts
>> here attachment with only my code, it is supposed to be put inside a folder >> with decNumber source code. >> >> BTW, I've found your link points to the same library :) It just changes >> domain >> name. > > That is a very nice piece of code. Thank you. > > To all > > Is there any interest

[Harbour] What about hard-coded make directives?

2010-03-17 Thread pete_westg
Hi, I don't know if it is technically easy or even possible to implemented, but i think it might be very handy to have inside main .prg one (or more) make-time directive(s) instructing hbmk2, about desired compiler options and/or libraries inclusion. Something like: #makeoption "/switch1",

Re: [Harbour] What about hard-coded make directives?

2010-03-17 Thread francesco perillo
I believe this is what hbc file is for... On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:52 PM, pete_westg wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if it is technically easy or even possible to implemented, but > i think it might be very handy to have inside main .prg one (or more) > make-time directive(s) instructing hbmk2, ab

Re: [Harbour] What about hard-coded make directives?

2010-03-17 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi, > I don't know if it is technically easy or even possible to implemented, but i > think it might be very handy to have inside main .prg one (or more) make-time > directive(s) instructing hbmk2, about desired compiler options and/or > libraries inclusion. Harbour compiler options can be con

[Harbour] Re: What about hard-coded make directives?

2010-03-17 Thread pete_westg
στις 17/03/2010 18:18, O/H Viktor Szakáts έγραψε: The rest would need hbmk2 to parse all source files for make options, which would in turn have a rather huge speed penalty. Plus it'd need a 3rd kind of option syntax to maintain (above existing .hbp and .hbc). No, in no way I did mean to parse

[Harbour] Re: hbMK2 - Uniform token to announce output file

2010-03-17 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > If you make such output parsing, make sure to always > use '-lang=en' option when calling hbmk2, otherwise > it won't work in localized (Portuguese and Hungarian > currently) environments. > > I've added -width= option, so if you now use it also > when calling hbmk

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbMK2 - Uniform token to announce output file

2010-03-17 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi, >>ENDIF >> ENDIF >> ENDIF >> --- >> > > I made experiments with above settings and code, > but I could never pullout the executable. To be on the simpler You have ": " before it and some sort of EOL after it. What was the problem? I can't see any reason why changing these to [