Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-25 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote: Hi Maurilio, > yes! with fm statistics off it works wonderfully :) Thank you for confirmation. Now it should work also with memory statistic enabled. When we will make some other test then I'll disable stack preloading for this systems and C compilers w

Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-25 Thread Maurilio Longo
Przemyslaw, yes! with fm statistics off it works wonderfully :) Thanks so much. Maurilio. Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote: > > Hi Maurilio, > >> I'm not completely sure I do understand the way the pre-loading of the stack >> gets done, but I think it ends

Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-24 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote: Hi Maurilio, > I'm not completely sure I do understand the way the pre-loading of the stack > gets done, but I think it ends up in creating a variable in every C function > which needs access to the stack. Exactly. > Now, > int f() > { > HB_STACK_TLS

Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-24 Thread Maurilio Longo
Przemyslaw, I'm not completely sure I do understand the way the pre-loading of the stack gets done, but I think it ends up in creating a variable in every C function which needs access to the stack. Now, int f() { HB_STACK_TLS_PRELOAD } becomes (more or less) int f() { PULONG hb_stack_ptr

Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-24 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote: Hi Maurilio, > I've reverted my svn copy to revision 9476, just before your last change, and > I can run every test in tests\mt without problems (rebuilding hbrun with mt > vm). > So it has to be something related to your last change. I rechecked them

Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-24 Thread Maurilio Longo
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > Thank you for testing. > The first thing I have in mind is that you haven't made full harbour > recompilation after this modifications. make clean make > log 2>&1 from top of harbour dir. > Are you sure that you have made _full_ clean build after syncing with SVN? > C

Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-24 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote: Hi Maurilio, > I've reverted my svn copy to revision 9476, just before your last change, and > I can run every test in tests\mt without problems (rebuilding hbrun with mt > vm). > So it has to be something related to your last change. Thank you for tes

Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-24 Thread Maurilio Longo
Przemyslaw, I've reverted my svn copy to revision 9476, just before your last change, and I can run every test in tests\mt without problems (rebuilding hbrun with mt vm). So it has to be something related to your last change. Maurilio. Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Maurilio L

Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-23 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote: Hi Maurilio, > I did the change to the makefile, I get an immediate SIGSEGV simply starting > hbrun. > (E:\repository\harbour-svn\tests)\harbour\bin\hbrun mt\mttest01.prg > Killed by SIGSEGV > pid=0x7e87 ppid=0x0253 tid=0x0001 slot=0x00b2 pri=0x0200 mc=0

Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-23 Thread Maurilio Longo
Przemyslaw, I did the change to the makefile, I get an immediate SIGSEGV simply starting hbrun. (E:\repository\harbour-svn\tests)\harbour\bin\hbrun mt\mttest01.prg Killed by SIGSEGV pid=0x7e87 ppid=0x0253 tid=0x0001 slot=0x00b2 pri=0x0200 mc=0x0001 E:\HARBOUR\BIN\HBRUN.EXE HBRUN 0:00026f26 cs:ei

Re: [Harbour] hbrun and mt

2008-09-23 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote: > Hi Przemyslaw, > is hbrun mt ready? I was trying to use it to run mt\mttestxx but I get errors, > sometimes, like this: > (E:\repository\harbour-svn\tests\mt)\harbour\bin\hbrun mttest01.prg > Harbour 1.1.0dev (Rev. 9479) > Error BASE/3012 Argument error