agree for extra installer
Best regards
2009/6/24 Viktor Szakáts :
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Massimo Belgrano
> wrote:
>>
> For all above reasons I think this is a perfect candidate to create
> an extra installer, which add these libs to the standard Harbour
> install tree (lib/win/mingw
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> I agree rc1 can be goodregarding this i have a question: is possible add
> option to distribute static library qt?
>
Technically it's possible although it makes distribution size grow
considerably, not to mention build times, which is alr
I agree rc1 can be goodregarding this i have a question: is possible add
option to distribute static library qt?
2009/6/24 Viktor Szakáts
> Hi All,
>
> I've already marked current build as beta2, but IMO it would
> much better to make the release process faster and release
> RC1 instead. The code
Hi Viktor,
>[ BTW, for 3rd parties it's now a good opportunity to check
>their code with 'set HB_USER_CFLAGS=-DHB_LEGACY_OFF' to see if
>there is anything else that could be done to source code. ]
I´m using it in FWH for a long time without problem.
>Although, since we're aren't compatible anyw
Hi Toninho,
All developers are appreciated to make local builds on all
platforms / compilers and report any testing results to the list
with current SVN.
Hi Viktor.
IMO we need a time for tests because some 3rd party libs are not
binary compatible and recompile it need time.
I for example, us
>All developers are appreciated to make local builds on all
>platforms / compilers and report any testing results to the list
>with current SVN.
Hi Viktor.
IMO we need a time for tests because some 3rd party libs are not
binary compatible and recompile it need time.
I for example, use FWH and I
