Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11610] trunk/harbour

2009-07-03 Thread Ranier Vilela
Hello Pritpal Bedi, Many thanks for your hard work! Thanks to Viktor too, the hands of Harbour! and of course Thanks to brain of Harbour, Przemek! Ranier Vilela ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mai

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11610] trunk/harbour

2009-07-02 Thread CarozoDeQuilmes
Hi Pritpal, for example, in my case, I'm silent because can't write very good in english, but I read all about hbqt and xbp. Great work Thanks and regards CdQ On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Pritpal Bedi wrote: > > Hello Angel > > Angel Pais wrote: > > > > Just a word to encourage you... > > Yo

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11610] trunk/harbour

2009-07-02 Thread Massimo Belgrano
Most part of harbour community is silent [i am opposite of silent sorry but this is my web identity] Most part want participate in read only mode and not agree share his idea if you read harbour traffic (web,sourceforce,ecc) you discover biggest interest You Have made right choice : implement

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11610] trunk/harbour

2009-07-02 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello Angel Angel Pais wrote: > > Just a word to encourage you... > You are hitting this right in the head, your work will have consecuences > for many years to come. > Without an 'oficial' multiplattform gui, harbour will never reach the > place it deserves as a fantastics either productive b

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11610] trunk/harbour

2009-07-02 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hi Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > Sorry, I didn't want to hurry you. You're doing a very > nice job and the progress is very impressive. > Thanks for the encouragement. > My only suggestion would be to concentrate on implementing > Xbase++ features first, and just then move on to extensions.

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11610] trunk/harbour

2009-07-02 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Pritpal, For me it's okay if they are all guarded with a macro (HB_XBP_EXT). All extensions have to be portable to all QT supported platforms though. BTW, does this mean that Xbase++ features and compatibility is now reaching completion? Yes, these have to he guarded. Feature compatib

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11610] trunk/harbour

2009-07-02 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello Viktor Viktor Szakáts wrote: > >>SUGGESSIONS: Should I implement Harbour extensions to the Xbp* >> classes? >> I find a wide scope to add few more instance >> variables to the >> class. > > For me it's okay if they are all guarded with a macro (HB_

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11610] trunk/harbour

2009-07-02 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Pritpal, Log Message: --- 2009-07-02 09:24 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com) * contrib/hbxbp/tests/demoxbp.prg * contrib/hbxbp/xbpstatic.prg + Implemented XBPSTATIC_TYPE_BITMAP. It is not Xbase++ compatible in the sense it is pulled from a disk file. But by attrib

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11610] trunk/harbour

2009-07-02 Thread vouchcac
Revision: 11610 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11610&view=rev Author: vouchcac Date: 2009-07-02 16:28:41 + (Thu, 02 Jul 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-07-02 09:24 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com) * contrib/hbxbp/tests/demoxbp