Hi Pritpal,
Log Message:
-----------
2009-07-02 09:24 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* contrib/hbxbp/tests/demoxbp.prg
* contrib/hbxbp/xbpstatic.prg
+ Implemented XBPSTATIC_TYPE_BITMAP. It is not Xbase++ compatible
in the sense it is pulled from a disk file. But by attributes
wise
it is exactly like Xbase++.
SUGGESSIONS: Should I implement Harbour extensions to the Xbp*
classes?
I find a wide scope to add few more instance
variables to the
class.
For me it's okay if they are all guarded with a macro (HB_XBP_EXT).
All extensions have to be portable to all QT supported platforms though.
BTW, does this mean that Xbase++ features and compatibility is now
reaching completion?
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
