Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> > > In this case you can copy hbmk.cfg to one of these location neutral dirs: > > /etc/harbour or ~/.harbour. > > The problem is that such hbmk.cfg will be common to all Harbour > installations I will have in the system. True. > > If there is a way to detect that softlink condition we can add

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: > In this case you can copy hbmk.cfg to one of these location neutral dirs: > /etc/harbour or ~/.harbour. The problem is that such hbmk.cfg will be common to all Harbour installations I will have in the system. > If there is a way to detect that softlink

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread Szakáts Viktor
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: I made some test with recent hbmk2 and it stop to automatically add [n]curses, slang and x11 libraries in link phase. I'll try to make some tests, but it'd help if you'd post your hbmk.cfg cmdline and -trace output. I've found the reason. Because I

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: > > I made some test with recent hbmk2 and it stop to automatically > > add [n]curses, slang and x11 libraries in link phase. > I'll try to make some tests, but it'd help if you'd post your hbmk.cfg > cmdline and -trace output. I've found the reason. Beca

Re: Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread toni...@fwi
Przemek, thanks! >Please inform Extended System that AdsGetField(..., ADS_NONE) >for character fields longer then 23 bytes read from DBF tables increase >pulLen by one adding one garbage character to the end of string. Done. I´ll post any news here. Best regards, Toninho. _

Re: Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread toni...@fwi
Przemek, thanks! >Please inform Extended System that AdsGetField(..., ADS_NONE) >for character fields longer then 23 bytes read from DBF tables increase >pulLen by one adding one garbage character to the end of string. Done. I´ll post any news here. Best regards, Toninho. ___

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: > Thanks, please test it now. Thanks, looks OK. I made some test with recent hbmk2 and it stop to automatically add [n]curses, slang and x11 libraries in link phase. Can I set some default libraries which should be used with all projects in hbmk.cfg? b

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, > > BTW I also found that aceapi-9.00.0.7.tar.gz is wrongly autodetected as > > 9.10 not 9.00. Viktor Can you look at it? > Of course, could you post me ace.h included in aceapi-9.00.0.7.tar.gz? In attachment you a have diff for version 9.00.0.7 and

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi, > I've just made test in Linux using aceapi-9.10.0.0.tar.gz and it gives > wrong results so also needs above workaround. > So I'll re-enable the hack I added. I do not know if newer ACE client > exists. Please inform Extended System that AdsGetField(..., ADS_NONE) > for character fields longe

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: Hi > > > Fernando reported that 9.10 is fixed. > > I'm not confirm this information. 9.10 still bugged without your fix. > So it means that it has to be reported to Extended System and the workaround > activated also for other version. I've jus

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-14 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 13 May 2009, toni...@fwi wrote: Hi > Thanks for your fix, but I'm an ADS 9.10 user and I can see that if I > use ads1.c 10193 2009-02-06 18:23:08Z vszakats, I see no bug. > The bug appear in ads1.c 10946 2009-04-28 19:35:27Z druzus. > Can you check it please? Maybe I'm wrong. It's possi

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-13 Thread toni...@fwi
>2009-05-14 01:16 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) > * harbour/contrib/rddads/ads1.c >* enable workaround code added in previous commit only for ACE 9.00. > If other ACE clients need it too then please report them. Hi Przemek. Thanks for your fix, but I'm an ADS 9.10

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11039] trunk/harbour

2009-05-13 Thread druzus
Revision: 11039 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11039&view=rev Author: druzus Date: 2009-05-13 23:08:13 + (Wed, 13 May 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-05-14 01:16 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/contrib/rddad