IMO, we shouldn't split out users to two "casts" (not to mention we also
support Darwin, DOS, BSD, HPUX, SunOS, OS/2), since
this would just raise the barrier between users, issues and their
resolutions.
Speaking of Harbour, most issues can pretty much be discussed
in general, regardless of the pl
i propose separate in forum WIndows & linux?
2009/6/16 Viktor Szakáts :
> Thanks Chen. Sf.net has a few probs indeed. Slow, mixed http/https,
> backup is broken. Latter two may get fixed.
>
> On 6/16/09, Chen Kedem wrote:
>> I'm familiar with forum administrating (not on sf.net), as already been
Thanks Chen. Sf.net has a few probs indeed. Slow, mixed http/https,
backup is broken. Latter two may get fixed.
On 6/16/09, Chen Kedem wrote:
> I'm familiar with forum administrating (not on sf.net), as already been
> said, it has pros and cons.
>
> Pros:
> - Messages can be self edited by poster
> There has been a Harbour Developers forum created on
> the Forums.
>
> I'm not sure this is a very good idea, as it will split
> development flow and information between this list and
> the forum. So, for developers it can mean double effort
> to track what's happening and potentially lost or mi
Il 11/06/2009 17.20, Alexander S.Kresin ha scritto:
Opinions from others? We need something more than
silence :)
I vote for this Sourecforge based phpBB forum.
PhpBB is, IMO, a very good engine, convenient to use. We shouldn't occupy
the comp.lang.clipper, it is intended for other issues and
> Opinions from others? We need something more than
> silence :)
I vote for this Sourecforge based phpBB forum.
PhpBB is, IMO, a very good engine, convenient to use. We shouldn't occupy
the comp.lang.clipper, it is intended for other issues and is a common
territory for Clipper and all Clipper cl
