I just correct the way that i call the name of database on create
and this solve the problem .
How is the correct way to create an index database and check if exist
using netio ?
Thanks and this is a great work
Bruno
2010/4/18 Bruno Luciani
> Przemyslaw
>
> I just add Hbnetio to my sample
> No , the idea is to test a Linux HBNetio Server
>
> and a Linux Native aplication , sharing Databases with
>
> a windows aplicattion running Under Wine and Samba
IMO only WINE and SAMBA can be the problem here, not
native .dbf and hbnetiosrv parallel access by itself.
Same problem set if yo
No , the idea is to test a Linux HBNetio Server
and a Linux Native aplication , sharing Databases with
a windows aplicattion running Under Wine and Samba
Bruno
Yes, it's WINE problem, not Harbour one.
>
> I was assuming a native executable in my answer (default case).
>
> Running any server u
> Bruno Luciani escribió:
>> Ok Thanks Viktor
>> I like to take a try , to HBNETIO using a little aplicattion made in XHgtk
>> but my network ( linux server ) is sharing databases using Samba and
>> I need to this work Correctly
>> Bruno
>
> Been there, done that.
> On that scenario DON'T run ne
I think that it is an ideal scenario , but I need to try,
once Netio works ok , I can not use anymore Samba
The Idea it is not use windows or wine if it is posible , but
while the solution is comming the both systems must be work together
When I have some time I try to test it
Thank' s to all
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Angel Pais wrote:
Hi,
> >I like to take a try , to HBNETIO using a little aplicattion made in XHgtk
> >but my network ( linux server ) is sharing databases using Samba and
> >I need to this work Correctly
> Been there, done that.
> On that scenario DON'T run netio server fro
Bruno Luciani escribió:
Ok Thanks Viktor
I like to take a try , to HBNETIO using a little aplicattion made in XHgtk
but my network ( linux server ) is sharing databases using Samba and
I need to this work Correctly
Bruno
Been there, done that.
On that scenario DON'T run netio server fro
Przemysław Czerpak escribió:
One small thing. Before MYRPC_FILTER() is called NETIO_SERVER()
checks if given function exists. If not then it returns to client
NETIO_ERR_NOT_EXISTS error code. It means that if you create
function RPC_MYFUNC() and client request to execute MYFUNC()
then MYRPC_FILT
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Angel Pais wrote:
Hi,
> >STATIC FUNCTION MYRPC_FILTER( sFuncSym, ... )
> > STATIC s_hLegal := { "DATE"=>, "TIME"=> }
> > IF sFuncSym:name $ s_hLegal
> > RETURN sFuncSym:exec( ... )
> > ENDIF
> > RETURN "<>"
> Would this also work ?
> STATIC FUNCTION MYRPC_FILTER
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas escribió:
sFuncSym is symbol (but not a string), and I expect RTE on:
'rpc_' + sFuncSym
I guess it should be changed to:
sFuncSym := __DYNSN2SYM('rpc_' + sFuncSym:name )
Thank you Mindaugas
___
Harbour mailing list (attach
Hi,
Would this also work ?
STATIC FUNCTION MYRPC_FILTER( sFuncSym, ... )
sFuncSym := 'rpc_'+sFuncSym
IF IsFunction(sFuncSym)
RETURN sFuncSym:exec( ... )
ENDIF
RETURN "<>"
So all you have to do to enable a function to be remotely callable is
name it beginnign with 'rpc_'
Przemysław Czerpak escribió:
STATIC FUNCTION MYRPC_FILTER( sFuncSym, ... )
STATIC s_hLegal := { "DATE"=>, "TIME"=> }
IF sFuncSym:name $ s_hLegal
RETURN sFuncSym:exec( ... )
ENDIF
RETURN "<>"
Would this also work ?
STATIC FUNCTION MYRPC_FILTER( sFuncSym, ... )
sFuncSym :=
tcp is already giving you a fair piece of resiliance against
corruption. not to say more robust stuff is absolutely unimaginable,
but you are not completely naked in the dark.
Ok I painted a vague picture. I agree tcp is a proven technology but
what
will happen with the following scenarios wh
Pritpal:
As explained by Przemek, it allows to connect to the
server practically from anywhere your ip and port is visible.
BTW at this moment your server is down or it has changed it IP.
Now is running again in d:\creative.ram
netiosrv_os2.exe 63000 192.168.2.64 d:\creative.ram
New IP is
> tcp is already giving you a fair piece of resiliance against
> corruption. not to say more robust stuff is absolutely unimaginable,
> but you are not completely naked in the dark.
Ok I painted a vague picture. I agree tcp is a proven technology but what
will happen with the following scenarios w
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Jerry Finuliar wrote:
> > Such functionality will be available in final version of alternative
> > IO APIs. It will be possible to redirect any operations but now only
> > functionality used by core RDD code is supported.
>
>
> Ok I'll wait for it. One more question Ar
> Such functionality will be available in final version of alternative
> IO APIs. It will be possible to redirect any operations but now only
> functionality used by core RDD code is supported.
Ok I'll wait for it. One more question Are there plans to address data
corruptions inherent in netwo
Alex,
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:29:16 +0200
From: Alex Strickland
Subject: Re: [Harbour] HBNETIO HB_ReadIni() Support
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Message-ID: <4ab239ac.6030...@mweb.co.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Przemyslaw Czerpa
Przemek:
I have two network cards in my OS/2 machine
192.168.1.110
192.168.2.64
and default route
192.168.2.1
so I am using
netiosrv_os2.exe 63000 192.168.2.64 d:\creative.ram
What mean/happen with 0.0.0.0 if I use ?
netiosrv_os2.exe 63000 0.0.0.0 d:\creative.ram
David Macias
_
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Jerry Finuliar wrote:
Hi,
> Thank you for making NETIO possible. Will directory functions be supported?
> (e.g.
> mkdir and rmdir)
> I need to scatter my tables for fast access.
Such functionality will be available in final version of alternative
IO APIs. It will be possi
Pritpal:
Now I know what's the problem.
It is path issue when creating and using.
When creating it is like net:\checks.dbf
while using it is net:checks.dbf.
:-)
Can you download current SVN and compile netserver.prg and run it as
netserver.exe 63000 0.0.0.0 d:\creative.ram
You are confusin
Pritpal:
I did not run 2nd time in d:\creative.ram.
Just now I run. Everything seems fine but I cannot reach to
3rd screen. If you check the folders now, it must contain
.dbf and corressponding .z01 index files in
d:\creative.ram | d:\creative.ram\caccomon .
.dbf are created in root still
Pe
Hi Przemek,
Thank you for making NETIO possible. Will directory functions be supported?
(e.g.
mkdir and rmdir)
I need to scatter my tables for fast access.
Thanks
--
___
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, David Arturo Macias Corona wrote:
Hi,
>> So the .dbf's are created in d: while indexs .z01's are created
>> in the folder where these belong to. Now the question is why this
>> behavior ? Przemek ?
It should be no difference. HBNETIO knows nothing about file type
or default
Pritpal:
So the .dbf's are created in d: while indexs .z01's are created
in the folder where these belong to. Now the question is why this
behavior ? Przemek ?
NetIO suggests that "root" of any server will never be allowed to
be accessed. Am I correct?
Anyhow, it appears that the NetIO pro
Pritpal:
It is creating files in root of d:\
15/09/09 5:27a 0 mydata
16/09/09 3:42a 0 creative.ram
16/09/09 3:44a99 0 a--- V661TDC2.dbf
16/09/09 3:45a 682 0 a--- OG_87YTT.dbf
16/09/09 3:47a 195 0 a---
Pritpal:
I run my application "Vouch" and it did show up the first screen.
A step forward. Then it showed me some errors and that I know why so.
Can you look into "data" folder where server is running and tell me if
you see some .dbf's and .z01's.
netserver_os2.exe is running in d:\mydata
Not
Pritpal:
From your prefered environment, use:
netapplctn 189.162.70.97 2941
First people in test will create files :-)
I cannot connect. Is it stopped now ?
I left it working around one hour and you tried later
Now is working again with new IP. Use:
netapplctn 189.162.166.143 294
At last, a delayed test :-)
Based in Pritpal Bedi guide, I made same tests with few changes:
- OS/2 as server, using gcc433
- Tests in LAN and Internet
netserver.prg and netapplctn.prg only contain change to use port 2941
netserver_os2.exe is running in \mydata
client was tested with winXP+wa
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009, Angel Pais wrote:
Hi,
> When trying to compile this new lib on Ubuntu I get...
[...]
> make[3]: `../../../../../lib/linux/gcc/libhbgt.a' está actualizado.
> make[3]: `../../../../../lib/linux/gcc/libhbmisc.a' está actualizado.
> make[3]: `../../../../../lib/linux/gcc/libhbmzi
Thank your...
I've done all that.
On sunday harbour complide well.
After recent changes It showed me the log I posted here.
So should I guess that on your ubuntu instalation netio compiled and ran
fine ?
Regards
Angel
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbou
On 09/02/2009 07:49 PM, Angel Pais wrote:
When trying to compile this new lib on Ubuntu I get...
an...@angel-laptop:~/src/harbour$ make
! Building Harbour 2.0.0beta2 from source - http://www.harbour-project.org
! MAKE: make 3.81 /bin/sh
! HB_INSTALL_PREFIX: /usr/bin
! HB_BIN_INSTALL: /usr/bin
!
On 09/02/2009 07:49 PM, Angel Pais wrote:
When trying to compile this new lib on Ubuntu I get...
an...@angel-laptop:~/src/harbour$ make
! Building Harbour 2.0.0beta2 from source - http://www.harbour-project.org
! MAKE: make 3.81 /bin/sh
! HB_INSTALL_PREFIX: /usr/bin
! HB_BIN_INSTALL: /usr/bin
!
When trying to compile this new lib on Ubuntu I get...
an...@angel-laptop:~/src/harbour$ make
! Building Harbour 2.0.0beta2 from source - http://www.harbour-project.org
! MAKE: make 3.81 /bin/sh
! HB_INSTALL_PREFIX: /usr/bin
! HB_BIN_INSTALL: /usr/bin
! HB_LIB_INSTALL: /usr/lib
! HB_INC_INSTALL:
34 matches
Mail list logo
