Wich kind of makefile is in Utils\hbdoc\makefile?
Will this structure be used as make_file instead old hbmake?
#
# $Id: Makefile 8377 2008-04-24 19:26:54Z vszakats $
#
ifeq ($(HB_MAIN),)
HB_MAIN = std
endif
ROOT = ../../
PRG_SOURCES=\
hbdoc.prg \
genos2.prg \
gentrf.
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Massimo
Belgrano
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 7:39 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: RE: [Harbour] Foreign libs
>> Then I try add this three lib but from hbmake I receive error C:
>> \HARBOUR\BI
: [Harbour] Foreign libs
> IMO a make system is important
> My suggestion is made something siple as sostititive for hbmake so
>
> / PDH Project Definition Harbour - File created by hbmake Version 2.0
> Date: 21.10.08 Time: 15:32:27
> WARNINGLEVEL = 0
> COMPILE_FLAG = -DE
IMO a make system is important
My suggestion is made something siple as sostititive for hbmake so
/ PDH Project Definition Harbour - File created by hbmake Version 2.0
Date: 21.10.08 Time: 15:32:27
WARNINGLEVEL = 0
COMPILE_FLAG = -DEURO
GUI = YES
OBJ = objpath
[myproject.exe] = myprg1.prg ,mypr
>> Then I try add this three lib but from hbmake I receive error C:
>> \HARBOUR\BIN\bin\harbour.cfg cannot be created. FERROR
>I didn't want to raise this, but, is there any objection
>to actually _remove_ hbmake altogether? Seems like it
>raises more questions than does good, and I cannot see
>
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't want to raise this, but, is there any objection
> to actually _remove_ hbmake altogether? Seems like it
> ...
> Any opinions?
IMHO a tool like that will never be useful: too heavy for easy tasks,
too light for c
Then I try add this three lib but from hbmake I receive error C:
\HARBOUR\BIN\bin\harbour.cfg cannot be created. FERROR
I didn't want to raise this, but, is there any objection
to actually _remove_ hbmake altogether? Seems like it
raises more questions than does good, and I cannot see
many peopl
plications?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Szakáts Viktor
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 5:28 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Foreign libs
Could you test it with ace32.dll? Would be great
if your could post s
Could you test it with ace32.dll? Would be great
if your could post some result .lib(s) somewhere.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.05.19., at 17:00, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
Convert DLL file into its equivalent static library by binarysoft
http://www.binary-soft.com/dll2lib/dll2lib.htm
How to create .lib
Convert DLL file into its equivalent static library by binarysoft
http://www.binary-soft.com/dll2lib/dll2lib.htm
How to create .lib file when you only have .dll and .h files
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/libfromdll.aspx
Will be used also for rddads, harupdf?
Without include his source in harbo
Overall I'm not a big fan of copying foreign projects
into Harbour (or to any projects whatsoever),
as there are plenty of thing to do anyway, and I'm not
sure there's enough capacity here to waste on updating
those foreign projects inside the Harbour tree, fixing
every warnings again and again, m
11 matches
Mail list logo
