>> Then I try add this three lib but from hbmake I receive error C: >> \HARBOUR\BIN\bin\harbour.cfg cannot be created. FERROR
>I didn't want to raise this, but, is there any objection >to actually _remove_ hbmake altogether? Seems like it >raises more questions than does good, and I cannot see >many people wanting to maintain this app.. After all >it's installed in the /bin folder, and it will make an >an immediate bad impression on Harbour for anyone starting >with it. Any opinions? IMO a make system is important My suggestion is made something siple as sostititive for hbmake so / PDH Project Definition Harbour - File created by hbmake Version 2.0 Date: 21.10.08 Time: 15:32:27 WARNINGLEVEL = 0 COMPILE_FLAG = -DEURO GUI = YES OBJ = objpath [myproject.exe] = myprg1.prg ,myprg2.prg, my sample prg3.prg, mytest.ch mysamplec.c ,express.res, lang.lib ,vm.lib, rtl.lib, pcrepos.lib, rdd.lib, macro.lib, pp.lib, dbfntx.lib, bmdbfcdx.lib, dbfcdx.lib, dbffpt.lib ,hbsix.lib ,common.lib,gtwvt.lib, codepage.lib ,ct.lib ,tip.lib ,rddads.lib ,ace32.lib, c:\mypath\mylib.lib ,wvtgui.lib IMO no other variable is necessary in hbmake This project definition pdh is Simple to create, simple to post on ng hbmk -pc myproject.pdh // for project compiling hbmk -pp myproject.pdh // wizard for create new project hbmk -f myproject.pdh // for complete rebuild project hbmk -p show pdh createted for compile list of phd files will start if you exec hbmk without parameter old parameter remain for compatibility What do you think? I am not able starting this working but is something start (and is a prg) I can test and implement _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
