Re: [Harbour] About some readme.txt and tests dirs

2009-03-01 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> > > Yes, I agree. I can remove these (except test.txt > > which is needed by the test program). > > Oops I didn't check it. I think it's better to use famous "Lorem > Ipsum" for text samples. > Actually it seems a "messy license" text. I'll do that. > > For the SVN that is, for a distributed

Re: [Harbour] About some readme.txt and tests dirs

2009-03-01 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote: > Yes, I agree. I can remove these (except test.txt > which is needed by the test program). Oops I didn't check it. I think it's better to use famous "Lorem Ipsum" for text samples. Actually it seems a "messy license" text. > These also see

Re: [Harbour] About some readme.txt and tests dirs

2009-03-01 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> > - if we shouldn't remove: > contrib/hbct/ctflist.txt > contrib/hbct/readme.txt > contrib/hbpgsql/readme.txt > contrib/hbgd/readme.txt > contrib/odbc/readme.txt > contrib/hbvpdf/readme.txt > contrib/hbvpdf/tests/files/test.txt > most are outdated and without any important information inside. The

[Harbour] About some readme.txt and tests dirs

2009-03-01 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
Looking inside actual tree I wonder: - if we shouldn't remove: contrib/hbct/ctflist.txt contrib/hbct/readme.txt contrib/hbpgsql/readme.txt contrib/hbgd/readme.txt contrib/odbc/readme.txt contrib/hbvpdf/readme.txt contrib/hbvpdf/tests/files/test.txt most are outdated and without any important infor