On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu> wrote:
> Yes, I agree. I can remove these (except test.txt > which is needed by the test program). Oops I didn't check it. I think it's better to use famous "Lorem Ipsum" for text samples. Actually it seems a "messy license" text. > These also seem outdated and redundant: > doc/funclist.txt > doc/lang_id.txt > doc/hrb_faq.txt > doc/howtomak.txt > doc/hbmake.txt Good. > Here I disagree, since IMO it's better to keep > everything belonging to one contrib inside one > subdir for separation of components. No problem it was just an idea. > For the SVN that is, for a distributed binary package, it would > be indeed very good to provide a subdir with all the > samples in it: > /samples/tests/*.* (from /tests/) > /samples/<example dirs>/*.* (from contrib/examples/) > /samples/<contrib name>/*.prg (from contrib/*/tests/) I wouldn't mix binaries and sources. F.e. under *nix you normally don't have the rights to create files in the install dirs. It means that you can't compile there. I think it's better to provide a zip with all the samples inside. > I don't know, but last time this file didn't work for me > on Windows either (it said it's corrupted). Since the test program > is expecting this file to exist, it would be good to change it to > create its own test files automatically (possibly a format which > is portable). Is there anyone in charge for odbc? If not I'll check it. best regards, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
