I don't see why such complication is necessary,
or what do you really want to do. If you need
"ANSI" codepage, why don't you use PTISO, or
it's also possible to add a PTWIN codepage if
you (or anybody else) can provide one.
Waw! This is great news for me! ??ISO cp is more than enough to my needs
This is impossible to tell when pasted to an e-mail.
Anyhow I've checked it locally directly in the source
and to me the PT850 looks alright.
Try to open src/codepage/cppt850.c with an editor
which you can set to 850 CP, or your browser. Or
do the same with above test after your write the
result
Nothing missing nor bug. UPPER(CHR(0)) ir CHR(0), and CHR(0) is end of
string symbol.
Sorry Mindaugas, but I couldn't understand what you mean. Can you give me a
hand please? :)
Leandro
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour
Hi Viktor
These are internal structures, so there if is any notion
of writing stable code I strongly suggest to not use
them directly at all.
I think the bug here is that you can access these members
at all. IMO they should be protected like HB_ITEM members.
You must be right. The .C code
Hello,
See code below:
HB_FUNC( _2D_CURRENTCODEPAGE )
{
const char * cdpID = hb_cdpID();
PHB_CODEPAGE cdp = hb_cdpFind(cdpID);
MessageBox(NULL,cdp->lower,'test',MB_OK);
hb_reta(4) ;
hb_storvc( cdp->lower, -1, 1 );
hb_storvc( cdp->upper , -1, 2 );
hb_storvc( cdpID
? "t1==t2",t1==t2 // shows .F.
? "t1==date()",t1==date() // shows .T.
? "t2==date()",t2==date() // shows .F.
return
Shouldn't the comparisons above all return .T.?
No, it's correct behavior. Think about SET CENTURY.
If you want reversible conversion independent from
any setting,
Hello
Please look at the code below (harbour 2.1.0 rev 13756).
<.code>
procedure main()
local t1:=date()
local t2:=ctod(dtoc(date()))
? "t1",t1// current date
? "t2",t2// current date
? "t1=t2",t1=t2 // shows .F.
? "t1=date()",t1=date(
So for me it's hard to understand why to reinvent
it, if we already have it by the name "RDD".
If we want to go beyond this and implement the whole
"ORM" buzzword, it's a whole separate project,
not just some extra lines of code in sqlmix.
ORM is defined as Object Relational Mapping at wikipedi
Hi all
I would like to help to make Official Harbour Documentation a reality. You
have been done an excelent coding job here and harbour could be much more
appreciated and enjoyed (yet) with a proper official documentation within.
Unfortunatelly I have been following that writing Official Harb
ect is
not a company and that nobody is paid for any participation or has the
obligation to do anything.
Let me know if there is something else I can do to help.
Best regards,
Leandro Damasio
--
From: "Bacco"
Sent: Friday, February 19
Hi
I would like to help to make Official Harbour Documentation a reality. You
have been done an excelent coding job here and harbour could be much more
appreciated and enjoyed (yet) with a proper official documentation within.
Unfortunatelly I have been following that writing Official Harbour
Is the proceding defined?
Read the ChangeLog.
You do not have to even use it.
Should I test it already?
I already tested it but as I said you do not have to use it at all.
I'll surely try HRB files as you suggested, but first I want to see how it
works with pCode DLLs.
Thank you very mu
There is an error when I try to recompile Harbour core with -DHB_DYNLIB.
Apparently the problem is about hbpp.exe
See the error below:
...
gcc -I. -I../../../../../include -Wall -W -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i586
-mtune=pentiumpro -DHB_LEGACY_TYPES_OFF -DHB_DYNLIB -ohbpp.o -c
../../../hbpp
Hello Przemek
>It will work but I do not understand how it's possible to call
>function by macro knowing it's name when macro value is created
>but in other context you do not know this name. Your above
>description does not make any sense or you simply forgot to say
>about some important condit
>But in the .prg code used for EXE file when you are calling
>functions which do not exist in it and are loaded dynamically
>then all such functions should be declared as DYNAMIC otherwise
>you will have link time error (function does not exist).
In my case of use the functions in the DLL are call
Hi Przemek
But in the .prg code used for EXE file when you are calling
functions which do not exist in it and are loaded dynamically
then all such functions should be declared as DYNAMIC otherwise
you will have link time error (function does not exist).
In my case of use the functions in the D
-implib for -hbexe is okay, I'll commit it. For the other,
I'd prefer to suggest -ldflag=--export-all-symbols until we find
at least one more target which supports this option.
Probably I've lost you, but does this flag (--export-all-symbols) supress
the need of using DYNAMIC clause on exe prog
Hi
We only have to choose name for this new option.
My propositions: -hasdyn or -usedyn -expdyn
Sorry but I'm the last person for such jobs but I believe that other
users can help us.
-usedyn sounds the most intuitive for me
Regards
Leandro
___
You are right. It's side effect of code added to exclude hbpp_dyn.obj
from DLL. I'll replace it with other solution. Anyhow probably today
we add support for using PCODE DLLs with standard static builds so
you can wait a while for it.
Ok Przemek
Thanks
Brgds
Leandro
___
Hi Przemek
If you are using statically linked application then it's necessary
to recompile Harbour using with HB_DYNLIB macro to force exporting
hb_vmProcessSymbols() and hb_vmExecute() functions. You can make it
by setting HB_USER_CFLAGS envvar, i.e.:
set HB_USER_CFLAGS=-DHB_DYNLIB
before c
Very good Viktor!
This text will be really very helpfull to many people!
Brgds
Leandro
--
From: "Viktor Szakáts"
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 8:27 PM
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Subject: Re: [Harbour] How to build and use pCode
Hi Przemek!
I know what you did and why. The same will work also in Harbour
if you use exactly the same C compiler and linker. Anyhow it's
really dirty hack and the worse thing you could do.
Believe me do if you would know all internal details of such
hack with all possible problems and how many
Hi Przemek
I agree though I do not now if I'm right person to describe it
in INSTALL. For shared binaries using harbour*.dll there is
no problem at all and it's enough to link PCODE dll with harbour*.dll.
The problem is only with binaries which have HVM linked with static
part of application. In
Hello Viktor
I hope someone can answer these, but until then I suggest
to lookup past messages, there has been _lots_ of detailed
talk about .hrb files, even recently. You can start by
looking up HB_HRB*() functions in ChangeLog and find examples
in source tree.
Thanks a lot. I'll follow your
Hi
I was creating them without any problems and from time to
time I made such tests together with HRB support.
As long as some of recent modification did not seriously
break sth then it should work without any problem.
The most important rule which users have to always remember:
it's illegal to
ly
make it more interesting to deal with.
In the meantime I'd suggest to consider to use
.hrb files instead. Unless there is the need to
include .c code in these pcode .dlls, they are
superior in all aspects, moreover they already work.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2010 Feb 8, at 13:34, 2D Info - Le
Hello
I have an aplication based on pCode Dll funcionallity. It was written in
xHarbour + BCC55 and now I need to know how to build it hbmk2+MINGW. In
xHarbour we could choose between 3 dll entry-points by chosing between
maindll.obj, maindllh.obj or maindllp.obj and once linking the dll with
m
Hi
How to build a pcode dll using hbmk2 + mingw?
And once built, is it enought to hb_libload it to call a function in the dll
from the exe?
Thanks
Leandro
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.ha
Hello,
I'm working on a new Win32 gui lib for Harbour and when I link an aplication
using hbide (hbmk2) it calls a empty black terminal window behind my main
window.
How do I avoid it?
Thanks
Leandro___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB
Rest should work, though if you need more
eval examples, I'd recommend grepping into
Harbour contrib or core (except VM) source
code, you'll find plenty of working examples.
It worked perfectly Viktor, thank you!
Best regards
Leandro
___
Harbour ma
*.h headers for
the most part.
I guess most things can be solved with it; if not,
you may describe the situation and if justified
and doable we can add new API functions.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2010 Jan 30, at 23:43, Leandro Damasio wrote:
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Just delete '#include "
parameter 'pArray'
hbmk2: Erro: Executando compilador C/C++. 1
gcc.exe -c -O3 -march=i586 -mtune=pentiumpro -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W
-Id:
/harbour/include array.c array0.c aseek.c
--
From: "Viktor Szakáts"
Sent: Friday, Ja
'
Just delete '#include "hbvmopt.h"', it's an internal header, not needed.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2010 Jan 30, at 02:34, Leandro Damasio wrote:
Hi
Attempting to build a program with the function below I receive the
following linkage error message:
undefined referen
Hi
Attempting to build a program with the function below I receive the following
linkage error message:
undefined reference to `hb_stack'
The error is related to hb_retnint and hb_retni calls, because when I ommit
them the error message goes away.
What is wrong with the code please?
Thank you
Le
Hi
Can you post thus statically linked hbide.exe ( in a zip format as it will
be huge )
somewhere on the web so that I can download to visualize what exactly is
happening.
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
Yes, you can download it at http://www.2dinfo.com.br/2dinfo/hbide.zip
Brgds
Leandro Damasio
The hbide main window opens ok and most the controls function well, but
the source button which results in Visual C++ Runtime Library error
message
Correction: clicking the "Open" button results in error message
tks
Leandro Damasio
_
which results in Visual C++ Runtime Library error message
"This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it an unusual way.
Please contact the application's support team for more information".
Seems to be a xbpFileDialog problem in hbide:selectSource method.
Brgds
for all the other libs. So I assumed that the lib
versions not ended with "d" were for static linking and that Qt was ready to
use and didn't run configure utility to [re]compile everything.
I will [re]build QT and hbide and report the results soon.
Thank you,
ore4.dll and if the DLL is reachable it crashes with message "Aplication
Error - Application not initialized correctly"
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks
Leandro Damasio
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbou
ted DLLs.
=
Even linked to static version of hbqt libs, the executable looks/asks for
QtCore4.dll and if the DLL is reachable it crashes with message "Aplication
Error - Application not initialized correctly"
Am I doing something wrong?
Than
I'd suggest to peek into INSTALL doc, where you'll
find answers for all your build related questions.
Found it on harbour INSTALL doc
Thanks Viktor!
Leandro Damasio
--
From: "Viktor Szakáts"
Sent: Thursday, November
I mean, how to build HBqt based programs with QT libs statically linked?
tks
Leandro Damasio
From: Leandro Damasio
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 10:21 AM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: [Harbour] Qt libs static link
Hello
How to build hbqt programs with QT static libs
Hello
How to build hbqt programs with QT static libs, independent from QT dlls?
Is it possible?
Thanks
Leandro Damasio___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/har
I believe you understand now what I wanted to mean by a real singleton
implementation, don't you?
You are a newbie here, so, Harbour is a little cheating on you ;)
I think you got me! ;)
Thank you all for the help!
Beat regards
Leandro Damasio
ic and
so effective as using the CLASS c structure [in class.h] to keep the
PHB_ITEM of the singleton object instance.
Thanks for the help!
Regards,
Leandro Damasio
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.o
lementation until
we know all the benefits which this can give us over already
existing methods.
Ok.
Few of us have proposed solutions, it'd
be nice if you could comment on them.
Oops! Sorry, I thought I was doing that!
Thank you
Regards
Leandro Damasio
__
does singleton means.
Regards
Leandro Damasio
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
eclare a singleton class, program its composition and behavior, box it in a
library and share it to other programmers knowing for sure that nobody will can
double instantiate it and cause error, because he declared to the machine that
this can't be done.
singleton class and that would be all.
Singleton classes happen in programming because there are singleton objects
in real life, so the native concept of singleton classes in harbour would
make programming safer, easier and clearer.
Regards,
Leandro Damasio
example below
Regards,
Leandro Damasio
EXAMPLE:
=
Case 1) A singleton class:
//---//
CLASS MyClass SINGLETON // THIS IS A SINGLETON CLASS!!!
DATA Status INIT 0
METHOD ChangeSt
;ve been studing both.
Now our aplications at 2DInfo are been changed from xHarbour to Harbour and
from hwGUI to 2DWGUI and once we finish this work, crossplataform funcionality
is going to be the next step and then I hope we will be ready to participate
more activelly.
Best Regards
Leandro
he wants for sure unique access
to all the members of a class.
I believe it would be usefull and simpler if one could just declare a class
as Singleton and have always acess to the same object instance when calling
the class by name.
What do you think?
Regards,
Leandro Damasio
Hi,
My name is Leandro Damasio and I have started to follow Harbour Project Main
Developer List few days ago. I recently started 2D Informatica with my
associate Ted, to develop commercial aplications using [x]Harbour. We used
xHarbour + BCC55 + HWGUI for about 3 years, until we read xhb
Massimo Belgrano said:
try
SET HB_WITH_QT=c:\devl\qt\2009.04\qt\include
set HB_DIR_QT=c:\devl\qt\2009.04\qt
ok Massimo
thank you
Leandro
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project
Is there native support to singleton (design pattern) classes in harbour?
Thanks
Leandro Rocha
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
I'm using WinxP SP3 + mingw32 + Qt 4.5
Mingw32-make results on the following:
C:\harbour\contrib\hbqt>mingw32-make -f makefile
! Building Harbour 2.0.0beta3 from source - http://www.harbour-project.org
! MAKE: mingw32-make 3.81 sh.exe
! HB_INSTALL_PREFIX: c:\harbour
! HB_LIB_INSTALL: c:\harbour\l
56 matches
Mail list logo
