Przemek:
2010-03-25 00:14 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/src/vm/dlmalloc.c
+ updated to DLMALLOC 2.8.4
* added OS2 support from our previous DLMALLOC version
+ updated to use our own recursive locks when available
* disabled hack which breaks strict a
Revision: 14235
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14235&view=rev
Author: jarabal
Date: 2010-03-26 04:05:40 + (Fri, 26 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-26 05:05 UTC+0100 Xavi (jarabal/at/gmail.com)
* harbour/src/rtl/teditor.prg
! Fi
> 2010-03-26 00:12 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
> * harbour/src/vm/hvmall.c
> * harbour/include/hbstack.h
>* reactivated for tests inline ASM code which can be used to access
> HVM stack pointer in MT HVM builds. It can be enabled in 32bit
> desktop windows H
Revision: 14234
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14234&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-03-25 23:44:10 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-26 00:44 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/src/vm/hvmall
Revision: 14233
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14233&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-03-25 23:12:28 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-26 00:12 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/src/vm/hvmall
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
> >> Is there a way to turn inline ASM stuff on?
> >> (sacrificing Win9x compatibility)
> >> I'd make a test with it to see the diff.
> > I also do not now it they will work with Win64. Probably not though
> > we can update then for 64 bit mode (here
Hi Przemek,
>> With rebuilt hbvmmt, the 25s went down to 17s, which
>> seems okay on win platform.
>
> Better though still the difference is quite huge.
> In my Linux box it's
> ST:
> [ total application time: ]14.69
> MT:
> [ total application time: ]
Revision: 14232
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14232&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-03-25 22:20:19 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-25 23:19 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
! bin/postinst.bat
Fixe
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi Viktor,
> With rebuilt hbvmmt, the 25s went down to 17s, which
> seems okay on win platform.
Better though still the difference is quite huge.
In my Linux box it's
ST:
[ total application time: ]14.69
MT:
[
Hi Przemek,
>> Is it reasonable result that in mingw MT mode, I'm getting
>> 21-22s result in 32-bit builds and 24-25s in 64-bit builds
>> vs. 10-11s in ST mode?
>
> No, it isn't reasonable ;)
What I suspected.
> MinGW builds do not use native TLS and we disabled ASM inline
> functions used t
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
> Is it reasonable result that in mingw MT mode, I'm getting
> 21-22s result in 32-bit builds and 24-25s in 64-bit builds
> vs. 10-11s in ST mode?
No, it isn't reasonable ;)
MinGW builds do not use native TLS and we disabled ASM inline
functions
Revision: 14231
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14231&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-03-25 20:37:39 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-25 21:37 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/src/vm/hvmall
> Thank you very much.
>
> BTW do you know _MSC_VER we can use to chose between __forceinline
> and __inline?
>
> WINE uses this:
>
> #ifndef FORCEINLINE
> # if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER >= 1200)
> # define FORCEINLINE __forceinline
> # elif defined(__GNUC__) && ((__GNUC__ > 3) ||
I don't know, I never used LISTBOX or C5.3, someone should try
this with Clipper to see if this is a real error.
BTW, dosemu works well on Ubuntu 32-bit.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2010 Mar 25, at 18:29, marco bra wrote:
> Sorry i cannot compare i have only Harbour on Ubuntu 32 bits i don't have any
>
Sorry i cannot compare i have only Harbour on Ubuntu 32 bits i don't have
any Windows or Dos here...
The only reference i have follow was
http://www.itlnet.net/Programming/Program/Reference/c53g01c/ngb388e.html
I'm testing the Mario H. Sabado code here
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.harb
Hi,
[...] s_fileRecvAll()
while( lRead < len )
{
if( conn->zstream )
l = hb_znetRead( conn->zstream, conn->sd, ptr + lRead, len - lRead,
NETIO_TIMEOUT );
else
l = hb_socketRecv( conn->sd, ptr + lRead, len - lRead, 0,
NETIO_TIMEOUT );
if( l <
Did you compare it with Clipper 5.3 behavior?
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2010 Mar 25, at 17:38, marco bra wrote:
> Same here on Ubuntu 32 bits and Harbour build
> the return key doesn't validate the codeblock and don't skyp to the next read
> i must to press esc to get codeblock evaluation and next fiel
Same here on Ubuntu 32 bits and Harbour build
the return key doesn't validate the codeblock and don't skyp to the next
read i must to press esc to get codeblock evaluation and next field read
access.
Here the p.prg code that i test compiled with " hbmk2 -lgpm p.prg -rebuild
"
Many thanks and best
Hi All,
Is it reasonable result that in mingw MT mode, I'm getting
21-22s result in 32-bit builds and 24-25s in 64-bit builds
vs. 10-11s in ST mode?
IOW it looks to run half the speed in MT mode.
('-gc3 -kmo [-mt]' were the hbmk2 options)
Brgds,
Viktor
___
vouchcac wrote:
>
> Revision: 14230
>
> http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14230&view=rev
> Author: vouchcac
> Date: 2010-03-25 15:22:47 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> 2010-03-25 08:03 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchca
Revision: 14230
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14230&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2010-03-25 15:22:47 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-25 08:03 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* contrib/hbide/resources/pan
Revision: 14229
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14229&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-03-25 12:53:09 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-25 13:52 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/src/common/ex
Hi,
PROC main()
LOCAL t
SET(4, "-MM-DD")
/* Trying to generate timestamp with time part only */
? HB_NTOT(0.12345) // OK
? HB_DTOT(CTOD("")) + 0.12345 // OK
? t"-00-00" + 0.12345 // Wrong: no time part printed
? VALTYPE(t"-00-00") // Prints "T". OK
? VALTYPE(t"-00-
BTW,
on OS/2 used CPU time of a thread is not available after a thread has ended,
so right now cumulative times shown are wrong.
Best regards.
Maurilio.
Maurilio Longo wrote:
> Przemyslaw,
>> You can also try
>>--thread= --scale
>> In such version each test is executed times by one thread
Przemyslaw,
> You can also try
>--thread= --scale
> In such version each test is executed times by one thread and then
> simultaneously once by threads. It means that it exploits the worst
> possible cases in synchronization and scalability. It should also quite
> well test spinlocks on multi
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Maurilio Longo wrote:
Hi,
> compiled cleanly on OS/2 with gcc,
> I attach speedtst output as a test to dlmalloc.
Thank you very much.
BTW In speedtst you can try --thread parameter without specifying number
of threads. In such version for each test separate thread is created
Revision: 14228
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14228&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-03-25 11:20:45 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-25 12:20 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/include/hbset
Przemyslaw,
compiled cleanly on OS/2 with gcc, I attach speedtst output as a test to
dlmalloc.
Best regards and thanks.
Maurilio.
Przemysław Czerpak wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> msvc 2008, msvc 2008 64-bit, old msvcarm (1201), darwin clang
>> and darwin g
Revision: 14227
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14227&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-03-25 09:38:27 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-25 10:38 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/include/hbset
Hi,
From below test, I can't pass through the VALID statement even though I
selected a value from level_list. Any suggestion?
Thanks,
Mario
function listboxtest
local level_list:={"A","B","C"}
local user_level:=space(1)
local getlist:={}
@ 1 ,1,6,5 get user_level lis
Hi,
Thanks a lot for PRINTREADY() patch. It is working fine, however, I get the
same output for LPT1 like in HB_ISPRINTER() and ISPRINTER() cases.
Does anybody have any idea why?
Best regards
Robert Skowronek
- Original Message -
From: Viktor Szakáts
To: Harbour Project Main De
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
> msvc 2008, msvc 2008 64-bit, old msvcarm (1201), darwin clang
> and darwin gcc build cleanly.
Thank you very much.
BTW do you know _MSC_VER we can use to chose between __forceinline
and __inline?
WINE uses this:
#ifndef FORCEINLINE
# if
Revision: 14226
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14226&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-03-25 08:30:18 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-25 09:29 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* include/hbapirdd.h
!
> > IsPrinter(“LPT1”) => always return “True” also when printer not
> > connected to that port
> > HB_IsPrinter(“LPT1”) => always return “True” also when printer not
> > connected to that port
> >
> > IsPrinter(“LPT2”) => output correct corresponds with the port status
>
> Are
Dear Viktor,
- Original Message -
From: Viktor Szakáts
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Printer Status Functions
Hi,
On 2010 Mar 25, at 08:28, Robert Skowronek(o2) wrote:
> In my application I want
Revision: 14225
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14225&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-03-25 08:10:42 + (Thu, 25 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-03-25 09:10 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/contrib/hbbz2
Hi,
On 2010 Mar 25, at 08:28, Robert Skowronek(o2) wrote:
> In my application I want to check whether LPT printer is available or not
> before I send document to it.
>
> In DOS application I used to use PrintReady() function successfully with
> numerical input 1 or 2 for LPT1 and LPT2 respec
Hi,
In my application I want to check whether LPT printer is available or not
before I send document to it.
In DOS application I used to use PrintReady() function successfully with
numerical input 1 or 2 for LPT1 and LPT2 respectively but in Harbour that
function always return "False" e
Hi,
msvc 2008, msvc 2008 64-bit, old msvcarm (1201), darwin clang
and darwin gcc build cleanly.
Good change.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2010 Mar 25, at 00:14, dru...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 14224
>
> http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14224&view=r
39 matches
Mail list logo
