On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor,
> With rebuilt hbvmmt, the 25s went down to 17s, which > seems okay on win platform. Better though still the difference is quite huge. In my Linux box it's ST: [ total application time: ]....................................14.69 MT: [ total application time: ]....................................18.42 (GCC4.4) I also tested MinGW/GCC 3.4.5 with WINE and ST: [ total application time: ]....................................18.68 MT: [ total application time: ]....................................26.31 > Is there a way to turn inline ASM stuff on? > (sacrificing Win9x compatibility) > I'd make a test with it to see the diff. I also do not now it they will work with Win64. Probably not though we can update then for 64 bit mode (here Win9x is not a problem at all :)) I'll commit small cleanup and build time macro to make such tests ASAP. Anyhow when HB_STACK_PRELOAD is enabled the difference is not such huge. In my test above MinGW build with stack ASM inline function and HB_STACK_PRELOAD macro enabled together gives for MT mode: [ total application time: ]....................................23.95 and such difference is close the results in Linux builds. > > BTW it will be also good to check how works native thread local > > variables in current MinGW builds. My last test are quite old and > > it's highly possible that now the situation is much better. > How to check this? Try to recompile Harbour with HB_USER_CFLAGS=-DHB_USE_TLS and check the results. Maybe I will not have to touch this ASM code at all :) best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
