[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12417] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12417 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12417&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-06 06:58:55 + (Sun, 06 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-06 08:58 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

[Harbour] problem with link tools library

2009-09-05 Thread marek . horodyski
I try build all from scratch from night zip file. Compilator is build ok. But when I try link my app after command : D:\harbour\bin\win\mingw\hbmk2 -n -m -w2 -gc3 -gui -gtwvg homar.prg braki.prg -lhbct -lhomar -lhbwin -trace ( in folder have I too file homar.hbc with contents : libs=hbhpdf lib

Re: [Harbour] HBMK2 - Error

2009-09-05 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hi Pritpal Bedi wrote: > > C:\harbour\contrib\hbnetio\tests>hbmk2 netiosrv.hbm > hbmk2: Processing local make script: hbmk.hbm > hbmk2: Warning: File cannot be found: netiosrv.hbm > hbmk2: Processing configuration: c:\harbour_dev\harbour\mingw\bin\hbmk.cfg > Error BASE/1124 Argument error: LEF

[Harbour] HBMK2 - Error

2009-09-05 Thread Pritpal Bedi
C:\harbour\contrib\hbnetio\tests>hbmk2 netiosrv.hbm hbmk2: Processing local make script: hbmk.hbm hbmk2: Warning: File cannot be found: netiosrv.hbm hbmk2: Processing configuration: c:\harbour_dev\harbour\mingw\bin\hbmk.cfg Error BASE/1124 Argument error: LEFT (Quit) Error BASE/1124 Argument err

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12416] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12416 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12416&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-06 01:58:03 + (Sun, 06 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-06 03:57 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12415] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12415 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12415&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-06 01:22:05 + (Sun, 06 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-06 03:21 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12414] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12414 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12414&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-06 01:10:09 + (Sun, 06 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-06 03:08 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

Re: [Harbour] building httpadv.prg in tip tests using ssl support

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Francesco, I successfully built httpadv.prg using mingw but with a few changes: 1) I have renamed hbmk.hbm in contrib\hbtip\tests\ because I have not found a parameter to make hbmk2 to ignore default hbmk.hbm (I miss something) There is no such parameter, but the point in this case is

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12413] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12413 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12413&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-05 23:44:22 + (Sat, 05 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-06 01:44 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * contrib/hbtip/hbtipssl.hb

Re: [Harbour] building httpadv.prg in tip tests using ssl support

2009-09-05 Thread Francesco Saverio Giudice
Hi Viktor, Bingo! I successfully built httpadv.prg using mingw but with a few changes: 1) I have renamed hbmk.hbm in contrib\hbtip\tests\ because I have not found a parameter to make hbmk2 to ignore default hbmk.hbm (I miss something) 2) I added a hbmkssl.hbm that points to ../hbtipssl.hbc

Re: [Harbour] building httpadv.prg in tip tests using ssl support

2009-09-05 Thread Francesco Saverio Giudice
Hi Viktor, Il 05/09/2009 1.46, Viktor Szakáts ha scritto: Hi Francesco, These things are already in SVN since then. I'm trying but without success. Now I have downloaded last openssl and I'm rebuilding last SVN again, but I get some missing exported openssl functions. I will mail some inf

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12412] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12412 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12412&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-05 22:02:37 + (Sat, 05 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-05 23:59 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * INSTALL * config/detect

[Harbour] ViaNemo: New Framework Opensource for Harbour

2009-09-05 Thread Lucas De Beltrán
Hello Fernando, It is a great idea, as Harbour lacks an official GUI. Fivewin is the most used GUI, and Harbour will improve so much if it has it´s own GUI compilant with Fivewin and capable to run in Windows, Linux and Mac. Where can I test it?. Thanks a lot!!!.

[Harbour] SQL RDD

2009-09-05 Thread Lucas De Beltrán
Hi, In Harbour, is there a RDD for SQL, so I keep the same code (such as SELECT ("INFO"), SET FILTER, PACK, etc). Thank you very much. Regards, Lucas ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12411] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12411 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12411&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-05 20:11:43 + (Sat, 05 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-05 22:11 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * contrib/hbcurl/Makefile

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12410] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12410 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12410&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-05 18:40:28 + (Sat, 05 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-05 20:39 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * ChangeLog ! Minor typ

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12409] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12409 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12409&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-05 17:20:24 + (Sat, 05 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-05 19:19 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * utils/hbmk2/examples/cont

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12408] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12408 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12408&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-05 17:18:12 + (Sat, 05 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-05 19:17 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * utils/hbmk2/examples/cont

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Istvan, On 2009.09.05., at 6:10, Bisz István wrote: Hi Viktor, Yes, it is normal to exclude the fulstatic case from shared, static and fulstatic test cases. But back to the original issue, why have we different I'm not sure I understand the issue here. I'd still be interested how can

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Bisz István
Hi Viktor, Yes, it is normal to exclude the fulstatic case from shared, static and fulstatic test cases. But back to the original issue, why have we different behavior between shared and static builds? The same problem appears with demoqt buils. It's time to go deeper in these issues. Best regard

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Looks that the linking stops on the first not found static library: This part is normal. Brgds, Viktor hbmk2: Processing local make script: hbmk.hbm hbmk2: Processing configuration: /usr/local/bin/hbmk.cfg hbmk2: Harbour compiler command (internal): (/usr/local/bin/harbour) -n2 demoxbp.prg

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Bisz István
Looks that the linking stops on the first not found static library: hbmk2: Processing local make script: hbmk.hbm hbmk2: Processing configuration: /usr/local/bin/hbmk.cfg hbmk2: Harbour compiler command (internal): (/usr/local/bin/harbour) -n2 demoxbp.prg -w3 -i/usr/local/include/harbour -i.. -

Re: [Harbour] Will hbmk2 be renamed to hbmk?

2009-09-05 Thread Massimo Belgrano
well If good for you is good for all 2009/9/5 Viktor Szakáts > i try explain my idea about the name 'hbmk2' /hbmk >> > > oh, okay. > > Better hbmk because not include a version number in file name like HBMK2 >> > > '2' is not really a classic version number, just an > indicator that this is th

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12407] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12407 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12407&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-05 14:24:06 + (Sat, 05 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-05 16:20 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * INSTALL + Little impr

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
$ hbmk2 -trace -fullstatic demoxbp &>fullstatic.txt /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgpm Quite strange that it gets detected at build time, but not at hbmk2 time. No idea how can that happen assuming the same Linux installation for both sessions. Anyhow it wouldn't work due to the removal of lib grou

Re: [Harbour] Will hbmk2 be renamed to hbmk?

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
i try explain my idea about the name 'hbmk2' /hbmk oh, okay. Better hbmk because not include a version number in file name like HBMK2 '2' is not really a classic version number, just an indicator that this is the second edition/incarnation of this tool. This means it will stay '2' for its w

Re: [Harbour] Will hbmk2 be renamed to hbmk?

2009-09-05 Thread Massimo Belgrano
i try explain my idea about the name 'hbmk2' /hbmk Better hbmk because not include a version number in file name like HBMK2 2009/9/5 Viktor Szakáts > Sorry, I'm not sure I understand. > > Brgds, > Viktor > > > On 2009.09.05., at 3:14, Massimo Belgrano wrote: > > as file name i prefer have bc

Re: [Harbour] Will hbmk2 be renamed to hbmk?

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand. Brgds, Viktor On 2009.09.05., at 3:14, Massimo Belgrano wrote: as file name i prefer have bcc32.exe and not bcc55.exe for search in web you are right 2009/9/4 Viktor Szakáts There is one prerequisite: we should drop hbmk script to do this. AFACS everything

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Bisz István
For demoxbp building I used the following command: $ hbmk2 -trace demoxbp &>shared.txt producing the output: hbmk2: Processing local make script: hbmk.hbm hbmk2: Processing configuration: /usr/local/bin/hbmk.cfg hbmk2: Harbour compiler command (internal): (/usr/local/bin/harbour) -n2 demoxbp.

Re: [Harbour] Will hbmk2 be renamed to hbmk?

2009-09-05 Thread Massimo Belgrano
as file name i prefer have bcc32.exe and not bcc55.exe for search in web you are right 2009/9/4 Viktor Szakáts > There is one prerequisite: we should drop hbmk script to > do this. AFACS everything is in place to make this move, > but I'd like to hear other opinions. > > If this is done, we can

Re: [Harbour] ActiveX

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
On 2009.09.05., at 2:41, Alex Strickland wrote: Viktor Szakáts wrote: IMO sorting out HWGUI from the equation would be essential here. I think you are right, but can it even be done? Without an event loop it's not much of a Windows app, and if I try and put all that stuff in, it might as

Re: [Harbour] ActiveX

2009-09-05 Thread Alex Strickland
Viktor Szakáts wrote: IMO sorting out HWGUI from the equation would be essential here. I think you are right, but can it even be done? Without an event loop it's not much of a Windows app, and if I try and put all that stuff in, it might as well be HWGUI. Plus, although I am very keen for th

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12406] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12406 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12406&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-05 12:21:22 + (Sat, 05 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-05 14:20 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.pt_BR.p

[Harbour] dos/watcom + watt errors

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
--- ! Building Harbour 2.0.0beta2 from source - http://www.harbour-project.org ! MAKE: mingw32-make.exe 3.81 sh.exe ! HB_INSTALL_PREFIX: C:\devl\hb20 ! HB_HOST_PLAT: win (x86) HB_SHELL: nt ! HB_PLATFORM: dos (x86) (autodetected) ! HB_COMPILER: watcom (autodetected: C:/devl/owatcom-1.8/BINNT/wpp386

Re: [Harbour] New harbour make world

2009-09-05 Thread Ranier Vilela
Hi Viktor, Thank you for the hints. I will follow your recommendations. Best regards, Ranier Vilela ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12405] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12405 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12405&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-05 10:51:22 + (Sat, 05 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-05 12:50 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * config/dos/watcom.mk

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12404] trunk/harbour

2009-09-05 Thread vszakats
Revision: 12404 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12404&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-09-05 10:36:30 + (Sat, 05 Sep 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-09-05 12:35 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * config/global.mk * conf

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Bisz István wrote: > Sorry I should correct me, the error mentioned by Lorenzo appears just in > the case when demoxbp is linked statically, the dynamic version works. I've never tried to link statically ( as far as I'm concerned ). I use: hbmk -n demoxbp -lhbxbp

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Bisz István
Hi, Sorry I should correct me, the error mentioned by Lorenzo appears just in the case when demoxbp is linked statically, the dynamic version works. ... ==20686== Memcheck, a memory error detector. ==20686== Copyright (C) 2002-2008, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==20686== Using LibVEX re

Re: [Harbour] Syntax of DllCall () - Harbour vs Xbase++

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Fernando, Hello Vikthor, No. The heart of this functionality is still non-portable code which came from xhb, and which only works on x86 CPUs. we can export to 64bits ?? Przemek had an idea to extend this for all CPUs (f.e. also ARM), but it needs to be implemented by someone interested

RE: [Harbour] Syntax of DllCall () - Harbour vs Xbase++

2009-09-05 Thread Fernando Mancera
Hello Vikthor, >>No. The heart of this functionality is still non-portable code >>which came from xhb, and which only works on x86 CPUs. we can export to 64bits ?? Best Regards, Fernando ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://li