[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11071] trunk/harbour

Revision: 11071 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11071&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-05-18 06:39:14 + (Mon, 18 May 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-05-18 08:38 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11070] trunk/harbour

Revision: 11070 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11070&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-05-18 06:26:56 + (Mon, 18 May 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-05-18 08:25 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

Re: [Harbour] Harbour nomination for sf.net best project/best dev tool

> If anyone can review the text in the site would, because I doubt if he > is completely correct. Any comments please post here. The SF logo link is now Ok - Thanks. I don't like the popup nomination badge, it block some of the site text and is just a bit too "pushy". Can you put a small icon (f

Re: [Harbour] Harbour nomination for sf.net best project/best dev tool

Vailton Renato wrote: Yesterday and today I was missing and therefore could not respond, but it is at least 3 days that I have all the changes the site ready and I can not update the site! I do not know if there is any relation with the problem of e-mail list, but the FTP is not even asking for

Re: [Harbour] Harbour nomination for sf.net best project/best dev tool

Hi, I have updated the link at the logo SF.NET and I sync the links that appears on our website are equal to the on page SF.NET in the HB project. Regards, Vailton Renato ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project

Re: [Harbour] Harbour nomination for sf.net best project/best dev tool

Viktor Szakáts wrote: Now the sf.net logo is the new one, however I still cannot click on it to go to our sf.net page. Can you add a link for the logo to http://sourceforge.net/projects/harbour-project/ ? Hi, Is it ok that, nominate link redirects to differen

Re: [Harbour] Harbour nomination for sf.net best project/best dev tool

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Vailton Renato wrote: > I managed to update the site successfully accessing via WinSCP. I put > a banner at the entrance of the site and updated the page of news with > this reference. Having completed this phase of the projects nomeating > will remove the banner

Re: [Harbour] Harbour nomination for sf.net best project/best dev tool

I managed to update the site successfully accessing via WinSCP. I put a banner at the entrance of the site and updated the page of news with this reference. Having completed this phase of the projects nomeating will remove the banner and leave only the references in the page for news. If anyone ca

Re: [Harbour] Harbour nomination for sf.net best project/best dev tool

> I think right now we're missing page loads from sf.net stats because > of the missing/old link. Is there a broken link on site or any valid reference? As I'm updating it if someone has any tips will be welcome! Best Regards, Vailton Renato ___ Harbour

Re: [Harbour] Harbour nomination for sf.net best project/best dev tool

I can access it via SCP (with WinSCP). I believe we've disabled FTP for security reasons. Brgds, Viktor On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Vailton Renato wrote: > Yesterday and today I was missing and therefore could not respond, but > it is at least 3 days that I have all the changes the site rea

Re: [Harbour] Harbour nomination for sf.net best project/best dev tool

Yesterday and today I was missing and therefore could not respond, but it is at least 3 days that I have all the changes the site ready and I can not update the site! I do not know if there is any relation with the problem of e-mail list, but the FTP is not even asking for username and password ..

Re: [Harbour] hbtest result with Pelles C ver. 6.0

Hi Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote: > > So I suggest to not use this compiler until it will not be fixed. > It's possible that this bug will break also some other Harbour code > but it cannot be such easy located. > Can you draft a small code which I can post to Pelle Orinius ? V 6.0 is still a

Re: [Harbour] hbtest result with Pelles C ver. 6.0

On Sun, 17 May 2009, Petr Chornyj wrote: Hi, > > Probably as workarond you can change in expropt2.c in function > >BOOL hb_compExprReduceEMPTY( HB_EXPR_PTR pSelf, HB_COMP_DECL ) > > the code: > > case HB_ET_CODEBLOCK: > > break; > > to: > > case HB_ET_CODEBLOCK: > >

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11065] trunk/harbour

Il 17/05/2009 17.27, dru...@users.sourceforge.net ha scritto: 2009-05-17 17:35 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/source/vm/classes.c ! fixed compilation in MT mode and HB_HASH_MSG_ITEMS macro Thank you Best Regards, Francesco ___

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11069] trunk/harbour

Revision: 11069 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11069&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-05-17 17:55:44 + (Sun, 17 May 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-05-17 19:42 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11068] trunk/harbour

Revision: 11068 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11068&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-05-17 17:52:32 + (Sun, 17 May 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-05-17 19:40 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

Re: [Harbour] hbmk2 require libpaths PSDK for bcc

Hi Chen, > Now my question is why? > I work 10 years with Borland C++Builder 3/5 and never had to add such > reference, > and I see no direct reference in my make or project files. > I do call Windows API from my programs and see no missing references during > link. > > Current bcc32.cfg and ilin

Re: [Harbour] hbtest result with Pelles C ver. 6.0

Hi, Przemyslaw Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote: > > Probably as workarond you can change in expropt2.c in function >BOOL hb_compExprReduceEMPTY( HB_EXPR_PTR pSelf, HB_COMP_DECL ) > the code: > case HB_ET_CODEBLOCK: > break; > > to: > case HB_ET_CODEBLOCK: > fResult

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11067] trunk/harbour

Revision: 11067 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11067&view=rev Author: druzus Date: 2009-05-17 16:37:04 + (Sun, 17 May 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-05-17 18:45 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/contrib/rddsq

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11066] trunk/harbour

Revision: 11066 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11066&view=rev Author: snaiperis Date: 2009-05-17 16:07:42 + (Sun, 17 May 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-05-17 19:05 UTC+0300 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas (dbtopas/at/dbtopas.lt) * harbour/contrib

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11065] trunk/harbour

Revision: 11065 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11065&view=rev Author: druzus Date: 2009-05-17 15:27:15 + (Sun, 17 May 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-05-17 17:35 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/source/pp/ppc

Re: [Harbour] hbtest result with Pelles C ver. 6.0

On Sun, 17 May 2009, Petr Chornyj wrote: Hi, > Harbour Regression Test Suite > Copyright (c) 1999-2009, http://www.harbour-project.org/ > --- > Version: Harbour 1.1.0dev (Rev. 11064) > Compiler: Pelles ISO C Compil

Re: [Harbour] Errors with 11032

Hello Mindaugus Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote: > > I've put my hands a to change gtwvg to be compatible with OLE > implementation, but I'm unable to test changes. Does anyone have gtwvg > sample with working (or GPFing) ActiveX controls. I've tried to use > contrib/gtwvg/tests samples. They d

[Harbour] hbtest result with Pelles C ver. 6.0

Harbour Regression Test Suite Copyright (c) 1999-2009, http://www.harbour-project.org/ --- Version: Harbour 1.1.0dev (Rev. 11064) Compiler: Pelles ISO C Compiler 6.0 (32-bit) OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600 Servi

Re: [Harbour] Errors with 11032

Anyhow I've now read messages from Przemek and Mindaugas targeting your specific AX problem, I hope it will be committed and we can move on to next issues. IMO your GTWVG AX code can also quite easily changed to use real pointers, or call an API. Hi, I've put my hands a to change gtwvg to be

Re: [Harbour] serious error in harbour (mistake field and variable)

Ops, I stand corrected. Brgds, Viktor On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > On Sun, 17 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: > > Also this variation didn't work in my tests, although it would be even > more > > expected: > > ? m->operator[ 12 ]:Eval( '04' ) > > No True. It perfec

Re: [Harbour] Errors with 11032

I've moved new ole to hbwin, because otherwise we will very very slowly adapt to it, since very few users would test it. Not exactly. It just broke all the linking process itself, simply unusable to test either. You still didn't post what error you're getting. First you wrote that you cannot

Re: [Harbour] serious error in harbour (mistake field and variable)

On Sun, 17 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: > Also this variation didn't work in my tests, although it would be even more > expected: > ? m->operator[ 12 ]:Eval( '04' ) No True. It perfectly works. Just simply you haven't check that after adding M-> to above example the RTE in this line stop to be

Re: [Harbour] serious error in harbour (mistake field and variable)

Also this variation didn't work in my tests, although it would be even more expected: ? m->operator[ 12 ]:Eval( '04' ) (well, I've never used m->, so I might be wrong) Brgds, Viktor On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > On Sun, 17 May 2009, marek.horody...@interia.pl wro

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbmk2: any features still missing?

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Massimo Belgrano wrote: > You can't support .lib extension on linux platform? > No, I don't like to change input names provided by users. Such hidden logic can create more problems than it solves especially on the long run. Consider that in this case we should als

Re: [Harbour] serious error in harbour (mistake field and variable)

On Sun, 17 May 2009, marek.horody...@interia.pl wrote: Hi, > try compile and execute this sample code in Harbour. > It correctly work in Clipper and xHarbour. I know about this incompatibility but so far I had doubts if I should make it 100% Clipper compatible due to support for arrays in fields

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbmk2: any features still missing?

You can't support .lib extension on linux platform? > > Just one comment: > > Using .lib extension works, but isn't recommended, because > it creates non-portable command lines. > > Brgds, > Viktor > > > ___ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-proje

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbmk2: any features still missing?

> > Ok. The main thing, which is unclear for me from the help is about > scripts. > What are .hbm files, are they different from .hbp ? 1) .hbm is simple the extension of the command line, same rules, same content, similar to many tools' @script functionality. It serves (just like command line)

[Harbour] Re: hbmk2: any features still missing?

> BTW, if there is anything unclear/incomplete in the current help, please speak up,I'd like to make it usable. > Ok. The main thing, which is unclear for me from the help is about scripts. What are .hbm files, are they different from .hbp ? Are the "libs", "cflags", "ldflags", "libpaths", "gu

[Harbour] serious error in harbour (mistake field and variable)

Hi, try compile and execute this sample code in Harbour. It correctly work in Clipper and xHarbour. *- Function Main() Public operator := Array( 14) Cls /* dbCreate( 'test', {{'OPERATOR', 'C', 3, 0}}) dbUseArea( .t.,, 'TEST', 'TEST', .f.) dbAppend()

[Harbour] serious error in harbour (mistake field and variable)

Hi, try compile and execute this sample code in Harbour. It correctly work in Clipper and xHarbour. *- Function Main() Public operator := Array( 14) Cls /* dbCreate( 'test', {{'OPERATOR', 'C', 3, 0}}) dbUseArea( .t.,, 'TEST', 'TEST', .f.) dbAppend()

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbmk2: any features still missing?

Thanks. On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Massimo Belgrano wrote: > I am working on italianthis is a preview > Using hbmk2 > hbmk2 is a Tool that allow compile sample and large project > basic use of this tools is > hbmk2 ac_test > hbmk2 ac_test.prg > After this command you have ac_test.exe create

[Harbour] hbmk2 require libpaths PSDK for bcc

Did built Harbour in a while, and I see that since 2009-04-21 16:25 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats, it is now require to add PSDK to the libpath of BCC. Now my question is why? I work 10 years with Borland C++Builder 3/5 and never had to add such reference, and I see no direct reference in my make or pr

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbmk2: any features still missing?

I am working on italianthis is a preview Using hbmk2 hbmk2 is a Tool that allow compile sample and large project basic use of this tools is hbmk2 ac_test hbmk2 ac_test.prg After this command you have ac_test.exe created You can also immediaply execute simple using hbmk2 ac_test -run Hbmk2 is indip