Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Phil Barnett
Viktor Szakáts wrote: Mmmm... Yes, perhaps. I'm nor shure if mailling list has possibility to allow *...@sourceforge.net users. Otherwise every "sourceforge.net developer" one by one should be added to list. This can have also

Re: [Harbour] Can the compiler warn if a local var is used unassigned?

2009-01-16 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote: > In Harbour variables are (kind of) assigned to NIL on its' defnintion, and > this fact is often used by programmers. We often do, something like: > > LOCAL xI > FOR nI := 1 TO .. > IF xI == NIL // xI is unassigned on first c

[Harbour] 2009-01-17 03:39 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2009-01-16 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
2009-01-17 03:39 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/include/hbgtcore.h * harbour/source/rtl/hbgtcore.c + added two new methods: TOUCHLINE() - marks line as modified REDRAWDIFF() - it contains REFRESH() from which is now called so it's possible t

Re: [Harbour] Can the compiler warn if a local var is used unassigned?

2009-01-16 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
Lorenzo Fiorini wrote: Thanks to great Mindaugas' -w3 addition I've done a major cleanup of my apps. I wonder if the compiler can detect if a local var is used before assigned. function main local nVar nVar := nVar + 1 return nVar Hi, it can detect, but... In Harbour variables are (kind of

[Harbour] 2009-01-16 22:05 UTC+0100 Francesco Saverio Giudice (info/at/fsgiudice.com)

2009-01-16 Thread Francesco Saverio Giudice
2009-01-16 22:05 UTC+0100 Francesco Saverio Giudice (info/at/fsgiudice.com) * harbour/source/rdd/usrrdd/rdds/logrdd.prg - removed sample at end of file * typos * harbour/source/rdd/usrrdd/example/exlog.prg * Altered to reflect new codeblock parameters and added local MyToStri

[Harbour] 2009-01-16 21:48 UTC+0100 Francesco Saverio Giudice (info/at/fsgiudice.com)

2009-01-16 Thread Francesco Saverio Giudice
2009-01-16 21:48 UTC+0100 Francesco Saverio Giudice (info/at/fsgiudice.com) * harbour/source/rdd/usrrdd/rdds/logrdd.prg + Added new function hb_LogRddValueToText() * Changed parameters send at CodeBlocks that user can define using hb_LogRddMsgLogBlock() and hb_LogRddUserLogBlock().

[Harbour] Can the compiler warn if a local var is used unassigned?

2009-01-16 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
Thanks to great Mindaugas' -w3 addition I've done a major cleanup of my apps. I wonder if the compiler can detect if a local var is used before assigned. function main local nVar nVar := nVar + 1 return nVar best regards, Lorenzo ___ Harbour mailing li

Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Well, we have option for both. It diff is problematic, we can easily have notifications without it. With diff, we also need to deal with maximum message sizes, which is 40K. Diff files can often be larger than that. We can raise the limit (maybe only for the forwarder mailbox), or omit the diffs.

Re: [Harbour] Uhttpd1/2 and ow.

2009-01-16 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
When add 2 lines in hbmk : wpp386 -j -w3 -5s -5r -fp5 -oxehtz -zq -zt0 -mf -bt=NT %C_USR% %_HB_PRG_NAME%.c -fo=%_HB_PRG_NAME%.obj Here -> wpp386 -j -w3 -5s -5r -fp5 -oxehtz -zq -zt0 -mf -bt=NT socket.c -fo=socket.obj echo OP osn=NT OP stack=65536 OP CASEEXACT %L_USR% NAME %_HB_PR

Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Francesco Saverio Giudice
Hi, Il 16/01/2009 16.38, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas ha scritto: Log Message: --- testing hook Log message is HERE , at the begining of email, so you don't have to look all content of email. Sometimes, I use to see changes of other developers, so diff output is usefull. Perhaps, the

Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> > Mmmm... Yes, perhaps. I'm nor shure if mailling list has possibility to > allow *...@sourceforge.net users. Otherwise every "sourceforge.net developer" > one by one should be added to list. > This can have also have some side effects, if someone uses redirection from > @sourceforge.net account,

RE: [Harbour] Uhttpd1/2 and ow.

2009-01-16 Thread Horodyski Marek (PZUZ)
>-Original Message- >From: Mindaugas Kavaliauskas [mailto:dbto...@dbtopas.lt] >Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 2:27 PM >To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. >Subject: Re: [Harbour] Uhttpd1/2 and ow. > >> How can I compile above file with soket.c and OpenWatcom compiler ? > >Hi, > > >I d

Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
There is option in sf.net to add multiple hooks, so there could be one hook with and another without the diffs. I personally wouldn't make it that complicated, as the main point of this list is development, so diffs shouldn't be something unorthodox or inappropriate here, at least IMO. Brgds, Vikt

Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
The other question is that, AFAIR and for description I have read, svnnotify will send every commit made to any file on SVN and not only to changelog file, as implemented on sf.net, and this I don't like. Hi, From: [vszakats users sourceforge net] Date: Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:26 PM Subject:

Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
Viktor Szakáts wrote: Maybe some sort of forwarder e-mail address could do the job. Mmmm... Yes, perhaps. I'm nor shure if mailling list has possibility to allow *...@sourceforge.net users. Otherwise every "sourceforge.net developer" one by one should be added to list. This can have also hav

Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> > Maybe some sort of forwarder e-mail address could do the job. >> >> As I have seen in sf.net docs the only option is: > "we only support one user-provided option to this script, the email address > to send the notification to" > so email will be sent using sf login name. > This can be solved i

Re: Re: [Harbour] Automatic SVN commit mails

2009-01-16 Thread toni...@fwi
>I think yes. +1, Regards, Toninho. ___ Yahoo! Mail - Sempre a melhor opção para você! Experimente já e veja as novidades. http://br.yahoo.com/mailbeta/tudonovo/ ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@ha

Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Francesco Saverio Giudice
Hi Viktor, Il 16/01/2009 15.06, Viktor Szakáts ha scritto: I'm not sure how svnnotify works, but if it's a client side solution, we haven't solved too much (the point would be to make this fully automatic for everyone), if it's server side, the choices are limited to the sf.net

Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
I'm not sure how svnnotify works, but if it's a client side solution, we haven't solved too much (the point would be to make this fully automatic for everyone), if it's server side, the choices are limited to the sf.net hosted notifier script, and with this, the only configuration option is a desti

Re: [Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread DB Topas
Viktor Szakáts wrote: Any ideas how to resolve that the best way? Hi, svnnotify --from somewh...@example.com Regards, Mindaugas ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Re: [Harbour] Uhttpd1/2 and ow.

2009-01-16 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
How can I compile above file with soket.c and OpenWatcom compiler ? Hi, I do not have OW compiler. You should find docs about OW compiler command line switches and try to run it. Later fix compile time warnings and errors, if compiler will generate it. Regards, Mindaugas ___

[Harbour] Uhttpd1/2 and ow.

2009-01-16 Thread Horodyski Marek (PZUZ)
Mindaugas, How can I compile above file with soket.c and OpenWatcom compiler ? Regards, Marek Horodyski ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

[Harbour] Fwd: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10057] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
This is how such e-mail looks like. It looks fine to me. Now, the problem is, the sender e-mail address is always the committer's sf.net e-mail alias, and our mailing list allows only members to post (rightly so), which means that we cannot set the mailing list address as recipient, since mails wil

RE: [Harbour] 2009-01-13 07:17 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi(prit...@vouchcac.com)

2009-01-16 Thread Horodyski Marek (PZUZ)
>-Original Message- >From: Pritpal Bedi [mailto:bediprit...@hotmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 1:16 PM ... >> Have you a wrapper #include for test xbase parts with harbour? >> > >harbour/contrib/gtwvg/tests/demoxbp.prg > >Pritpal How can I build demowvg with OpenWatcom ? I se

Re: [Harbour] Automatic SVN commit mails

2009-01-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
http://alexandria.wiki.sourceforge.net/Subversion+-+Version+Control+for+Source+Codeunder "Hook scripts" I assume it would include the commit message in the e-mail, and SVN users should make sure the commit message always contains the relevant ChangeLog entry. This is the good practice anyway, and

Re: [Harbour] Automatic SVN commit mails

2009-01-16 Thread Francesco Saverio Giudice
Hi Viktor, Il 16/01/2009 1.49, Viktor Szakáts ha scritto: There is a short mod and a long mode, where the diff is included. If it is possible to limit only to Changelog file, then ok in long mode with diff. Do you have a link to sf.net site where I can read something or see a sample ? Best

Re: [Harbour] Automatic SVN commit mails

2009-01-16 Thread fmancera
Hello Viktor, > Hi all, > On sf.net there is support automatic commit e-mails for SVN. > It's easy to setup on the sf.net admin page. > > There is a short mod and a long mode, where the diff is included. > > What do you guys think about enabling it, so that the ChangeLog > e-mails are sent auto