Re: Emacs dependent package input question

2025-04-05 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Samstag, dem 05.04.2025 um 16:27 -0700 schrieb Ian Eure: > Yes, this definitely solves it at a direct package level, but > leaves much to be desired for cases of transitive dependencies. > For example, emacs-orgit-forge depends on emacs-forge, which > depends on emacs-emacsql, which depends o

Re: Guix on the MNT/Reform

2025-04-05 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2025-03-19, Denis Carikli wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:30:29 -0700 > Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2025-03-16, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: >> > On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:37:09 -0700 >> > Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> >> One could not be enabled due to DEBLOBBING the wifi drivers, and >> >>

Re: Thoughtful updates to TexLive

2025-04-05 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 03:21:15PM +0100 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: > The upgrade process is explained at length in the comments of the > "tex.scm" module in case anyone is curious about it. > I don’t keep track of anything. I let the importer tell me what packages > disappeared, and what are the new

Re: Applying Patches for Review

2025-04-05 Thread Noé Lopez
Gabriel Santos writes: > Greetings, > > I found an interesting patch, viz. 76910, and I want to > help it out with a review by trying the patch out. > > I tried looking into how this is done but couldn't find > anything in the manual. > > So, the question is: how can one apply a patch submitted >

Re: [PATCH 00/48] Extend bag-build to gexps.

2025-04-05 Thread Nicolas Graves
On 2025-03-21 11:20, Sergio Pastor Pérez wrote: > > The version 2 has less patches. Do I need to apply only v2? Yes, I merged some patches because my mail are capped to 200/hour and I reached that in v1. -- Best regards, Nicolas Graves

Re: [Shepherd] Disappearing timer

2025-04-05 Thread Rutherther
Hello Felix, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > Hi, > > My timer join-irc-channels [1] starts when being 'deployed' but is gone > after a reboot, even though the Shepherd configuration includes a > reference to it. [2] There is no trace: > >

Re: “Build daemon drops its privileges” 👈 blog post

2025-04-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hey, Cayetano Santos skribis: > One comment in paragraph about "Migrating an existing installation ...", > which sounds bad. It suggest that users are at their own (unless this is > documented somewhere ?); "we may provide a helper script in the future > ..." feels like guix-foreigners are secon

Re: emacs-next periodic updates

2025-04-05 Thread Gabriel Santos
Greetings, I'll send a patch today, after I get all packages built again. It's based on a newer commit - 467aba6 - and I also enabled the QEMU service to compile for different architectures on my system. I decided to deprecate emacs-next-pgtk-xwidgets, pointing it to emacs-next-pgtk instead. I w

[Shepherd] Default value for #:wait-for-termination?

2025-04-05 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi, Should we change the default for the #:wait-for-termination? parameter in the Shepherd's make-timer-constructor to #t? It seems safer. I added to all my timers. Kind regards Felix

Re: Per-user Guix installations

2025-04-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Konrad Hinsen skribis: >> But then, the problem is that ‘guix pull’ or in fact any ‘guix’ command >> will give you non-relocatable binaries. So you need to somehow map, >> say, ~/.local/state/guix/store to /gnu/store for all the user sessions, >> as seamlessly as possible. > > Or change

Re: A silly concern about substitute servers

2025-04-05 Thread Christopher Baines
Pan Xie writes: > 1. Does a substitute server keeps all the packages it build? If the > answer is yes, won't it consume huge storage resources? If the answer > is no, then the user who use time-machine travel back to > >     years before have to build all the packages from scratch? For the borde

Emacs dependent package input question

2025-04-05 Thread Ian Eure
Hi Guixers, I’ve seen a few patches for Emacs packages lately which have the form: (package emacs-whatever (name "emacs-whatever") (description "Emacs interface for Whatever") (inputs (list whatever)) (arguments (list #:phases (modify-phases %standard

Re: How is security managed in Guix? Should there be a team?

2025-04-05 Thread Nicolas Graves
On 2025-04-04 16:21, John Kehayias via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." wrote: > Hello, > > (CCing some more security people) > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 05:51 PM, Simon Josefsson via \"Development of GNU > Guix and the GNU System distribution.\" wrote: > >> Nicolas Gra

Re: How is security managed in Guix? Should there be a team?

2025-04-05 Thread Nicolas Graves
On 2025-04-04 23:51, Simon Josefsson via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." wrote: > I think a Guix security team have at least two different tasks: > > 1) Answer privately about any security coordination needed, especially > about Guix-specific problems. So this one seem

Heads up: LibreWolf 137.0-1 withdrawn due to a bug

2025-04-05 Thread Ian Eure
I pushed a commit for LibreWolf 137.0-1 Thursday night, and pushed a revert yesterday afternoon. The upstream release was pulled, as it contains a bug. Upstream Firefox 137.0 changed the profile storage location from ~/.firefox to ~/mozilla/firefox, which resulted in LibreWolf’s profile locat

Re: Thoughtful updates to TexLive

2025-04-05 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello, Am Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 07:09:46PM +0100 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: > > This looks a lot like https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75893 . > > I should test with your fix on the tex-team branch. > I would indeed appreciate some feedback! as mentioned in the issue, your fix appears to work very well.

Re: Debbugs changes on #guix

2025-04-05 Thread Rutherther
Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > Hi, > > I enabled an experimental barebones feature that broadcasts Debbugs > changes on #guix. It's another technical feature that could improve the > speed at which bugs are being closed. Hello, this seems

Re: [bug#76503] [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

2025-04-05 Thread pinoaffe
Simon Tournier writes: > For instance, magit-forge does not work with Codeberg although their > documentation says so. Well, neither Ludo or I have succeeded in > configuring it, although we asked advice on Mastodon [1,2]. magit-forge has practically no support for forgejo yet, it only knows h

Re: Mirroring the mirror?

2025-04-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Simon Tournier skribis: > I’m just discovering the Forgejo instance of sourceware: > > https://forge.sourceware.org/explore/organizations > > Here, mirror of GCC, Glibc and others are already hosted. > > Therefore, it would make sense to check their willing and capacity to > backup Guix;

Re: Guix booth at JDLL in Lyon, France?

2025-04-05 Thread Tanguy Le Carrour
On Sun Mar 23, 2025 at 12:29 PM CET, Julien Lepiller wrote: > I just received a confirmation that our booth is accepted! 🥳

Re: GNU & Guix

2025-04-05 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Hi Caleb, Caleb Herbert wrote: [To pinoaffe:] >That's a disingenuous suggestion [To Andreas:] >You're denying the truth. You've been around long enough to know that you're out of line without needing to be told. You should apologise to at least pinoaffe and Andreas. I can't assume good f

Re: bug#76503: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

2025-04-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Simon Tournier skribis: > Currently, the name of specifications reads [1]: > > forgejo-pull-requests-guix-science-carputils-91 > forgejo-pull-requests-guix-science-equinox-cherrypick-84 > forgejo-pull-requests-guix-science-ghdl-87 > forgejo-pull-requests-guix-science-maste

Re: Emacs dependent package input question

2025-04-05 Thread Ian Eure
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Graves writes: On 2025-04-05 09:38, Ian Eure wrote: Hi Ian, thanks for this discussion. This is my (d) (better policy proposition): a) Leave it as is. Don’t love it, but if there’s concensus that this is the right way, then okay. I'd argue sometimes it's indeed

Re: Emacs dependent package input question

2025-04-05 Thread Ian Eure
Liliana Marie Prikler writes: Am Samstag, dem 05.04.2025 um 09:38 -0700 schrieb Ian Eure: Hi Guixers, I’ve seen a few patches for Emacs packages lately which have the form:     (package emacs-whatever   (name "emacs-whatever")   (description "Emacs interface for Whatever")   (

Re: Search alerts and Watch issue on mumi

2025-04-05 Thread Gabriel Santos
>I tried this, and it brings the "Projects" link higher up, but leaves >the little dropdown arrow where it is. I'll probably go with Luis' >suggestion in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/77513#1 Nice to see someone suggested a fix already! -- Gabriel Santos

Slow guix pull? (was Re: Please don't leave GNU)

2025-04-05 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Florian, On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 at 12:55, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > Caleb Herbert writes: >> * Guix is slow at package management, even slower than DNF. > > Git-based Guix pull is slow because of Git, yes. But it must use a big > Git repo for its reproducibility, transactions and

Re: Search alerts and Watch issue on mumi

2025-04-05 Thread Arun Isaac
> Love it. Really. Thanks a lot for all those improvements to mumi, which > is getting more and more useful with time. Thank you very much for the encouragement. :-) I hope I can continue to hack on mumi for a while. >> Search alerts and issue watching are all powered by Atom feeds under the >>

Re: Emacs dependent package input question

2025-04-05 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Samstag, dem 05.04.2025 um 09:38 -0700 schrieb Ian Eure: > Hi Guixers, > > I’ve seen a few patches for Emacs packages lately which have the > form: > >     (package emacs-whatever >   (name "emacs-whatever") >   (description "Emacs interface for Whatever") >   (inputs (list whatev

Re: Emacs dependent package input question

2025-04-05 Thread Nicolas Graves
On 2025-04-05 09:38, Ian Eure wrote: Hi Ian, thanks for this discussion. This is my (d) (better policy proposition): > a) Leave it as is. Don’t love it, but if there’s concensus that > this is the right way, then okay. I'd argue sometimes it's indeed the better solution, especially when th

Re: Search alerts and Watch issue on mumi

2025-04-05 Thread Arun Isaac
Hi Gabriel, Thank you for your quick response! > mumi.css 1970:2 >> line-height: var(--line-height); > > Brought "Projects" to the same height as "Search Alert". I tried this, and it brings the "Projects" link higher up, but leaves the little dropdown arrow where it is. I'll probably go with L