Hi Caleb, Caleb Herbert <c...@bluehome.net> wrote:
[To pinoaffe:] >That's a disingenuous suggestion [To Andreas:] >You're denying the truth. You've been around long enough to know that you're out of line without needing to be told. You should apologise to at least pinoaffe and Andreas. I can't assume good faith if you can't. What do you expect this kind of disruptive behaviour to achieve? It is comically unclear. The Guix Days are not pre-planned. Anyone can attend, anyone present can suggest a topic, and anyone present can express interest in discussing it. Then that discussion ends up in the notes. That's it. I wasn't there. Clearly, Andreas was not. At most, 1 of 3 maintainers were. 0 is equally likely because we haven't yet managed to clone Efraim. So contrary to what some like to believe, there's no leadership(lol)-level scheming in Guix to 'leave' GNU. No such plans from the maintainership. However, those pesky passive maintainers (hello) have been mostly ignoring the issue and should probably… not? We might even need to make a decision (eek). So thanks for reminding everyone of that, even if it wasn't your intention. Kind regards, T G-R Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
