Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 02:12:40AM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > This doesn't take care of existing repositories, and it is possible to > handle that as well but the way I know does require practical control > over the infrastructure (there may be better ways though that works > without ss

Re: bug#65974: [PATCH 00/33] thirty something go packages

Hi Sharlatan, JSYK, you're sending encrypted messages to lists. See . I think this is the second one I've seen, so something's misconfigured on your end. Kind regards, T G-R Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.

Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:44:42 +0100 Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: > [...] in Git there's no slave. Personally I find 'main' more accurate precisely because of that. Git enables to more easily maintain branches (not necessarily in the same repository) with modifications on top, and/or to diverge, and so f

Re: Re: [GCD] Rename “main” branch

This thread reminds me RFC1925 https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1925 "The Twelve Networking Truths" <1996-04-01>. ^.^ Oleg signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:15:01 +0100 Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 13.02.2025 um 10:30 + schrieb Attila Lendvai: > > > Here's my perspective: it will cost us basically nothing to rename > > > the master branch, > > > > i suspect you'd be surprised how many places will need

Re: [GCD] Set search paths without program wrappers

Hi 宋文武, On Sun, 02 Feb 2025 at 12:57, 宋文武 via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." wrote: > title: Set search paths without program wrappers > id: 003 > status: draft > discussion: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/ > authors: 宋文武 > sponsors: Maxim Cournoyer > date-submitted:

Guix Consensus Document: Git repo and workflow

Hi all, Please consider the Git repository hosting the GCDs: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-consensus-documents.git/ And the README file proposes a workflow. It’s up to changes. :-) Feel free to drop new GCDs. However, please consider that it takes time to read and forge an o

Re: Trying out Codeberg

Hi Ludo, On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 17:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >perhaps even before GCD #001 is committed > (not sure what’s going on here :-)) Probably because I’m lagging… Well, now it’s ready from my side. :-) Feel free to tweak, if it’s not clear enough. Cheer

Re: [GCD] Rename “main” branch

Hi Liliana, On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 09:42, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > title: Rename "main" branch > id: 003 > status: draft > discussion: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/ > authors: Liliana Marie Prikler > sponsors: > date: > SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0 OR GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-only

Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

Hi Ludo, On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 15:33, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > title: Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg > id: 002 > status: draft > discussion: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/ > authors: Ludovic Courtès > sponsors: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, Ricardo Wurmus > date-submitted: > d

Re: Trying out Codeberg

Hi Olivier, On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 13:51, Olivier Dion wrote: > I have not follow the entire thread about this migration. > > Will the mail-patch workflow still available? The mail-patch workflow is still available. It will be available until a GCD changing is accepted. And such GCD will expl

Re: renaming of fpga.scm module

>lun. 17 févr. 2025 at 21:03, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi Cayetano, > > Andreas Enge writes: > >> Am Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 10:11:17AM +0100 schrieb Cayetano Santos: >>> Two options at this point: we keep on happily dropping loosely related >>> packages somewhere (is that a problem, after all ?);

Re: Guix Consensus Document: Git repo and workflow

Simon Tournier writes: > Hi all, > > Please consider the Git repository hosting the GCDs: > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-consensus-documents.git/ > > And the README file proposes a workflow. It’s up to changes. :-) > > Feel free to drop new GCDs. However, please consider th

Re: Trying out Codeberg

People, I find codeberg to be slow :-/ Cheers, Bost