>lun. 17 févr. 2025 at 21:03, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Cayetano, > > Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> writes: > >> Am Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 10:11:17AM +0100 schrieb Cayetano Santos: >>> Two options at this point: we keep on happily dropping loosely related >>> packages somewhere (is that a problem, after all ?); or we create a new >>> team (if there is interest on participating) to organise and maintain >>> these packages (I volunteer). >> >> Teams are always a good idea! > > I'd be happy to be on an electronic team. I guess two makes a team 😀 > I don't see it as a bad thing to keep our current '(gnu packages > electronics)' as the fourre-tout for eletronics packages that do not > have a better home yet, while having more specific ones like the FPGA > packages in (gnu packages fpga), and perhaps one day (gnu packages asic) > or (gnu packages eda) for electronics design automation. As stated before, the border line between domains is rather thin, with frequent overflows (vhdl/verilog are asic of fpga ?), but still > In other words, I'd keep what we have but introduce an electronics-team > with a scope that covers them. How do we proceed with this ? Do we send a patch for the new (binary) team ? Anyone else interested ? -- Cayetano Santos . gpg: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682 key: meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
