Federico Beffa writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> I’m in the middle of upgrading our Haskell packages. (Actually, I’m
>> just yak shaving. I need “pandoc-citeproc” for “r-knitr”…)
>>
>> I noticed that upgrading Haskell packages is a pain in the neck because
>> of propagated
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>
>>> Hi Guix,
>>>
>>> I’m in the middle of upgrading our Haskell packages. (Actually, I’m
>>> just yak shaving. I need “pandoc-citeproc” for “r-knitr”…)
>>>
>>> I noticed that upgrading Haskell packages is a pain in the neck because
>>> of propagated inputs. It seems
ng0 writes:
> Hi,
>
> "Patricia J. Hawkins" writes:
>
>> I'm just getting started setting up to use notmuch (your message
>> attracted my attention to it!) but looks like the afew script is
>> designed to do this, as a companion processer ("initial tagging") for
>> notmuch.
>>
>> https://github.
The GPL itself is not Free (!)
It's license is:
"Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed."
PLUS some extra permissions regarding translation which are
given at https://www.gnu.org/licenses/translations.html
Note
Hi,
Currently, we build a single set of x86_64 packages assuming SSE but not
SSE2 instructions, but sometimes it would be nice to use more recent
instructions like AVX. So I'm wondering if there is some way to specify
a system more specific than 'X86_64'? I tried simply adding
'--with-arch=ha
John Darrington skribis:
> From: John Darrington
>
>
> New patch as requested.
>
>
>
>
> * guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm (patch-dot-desktop-files): New procedure.
I pushed a modified version of this patch as
d31860b9de07810e114490db5cc160a8b078c58d, essentially making it more
concise and addi
Hi!
csanchez...@gmail.com (Carlos Sánchez de La Lama) skribis:
>> In ‘raw-build’ in bootstrap.scm, we run:
>>
>> xz -dc thing.tar.xz | tar xv
>
> If I have understood correctly the code, raw-build is only used for
> %bootstrap-guile. However, the problem arises when building make (I do
> not ha
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:52:34PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
>> Ah just checked our linter doesn't flag a CVE, so I think we're ok...
>
> The linter is a good tool for catching things that we miss, but it's not
> a substitute for manual investigation :)
+1
> First, our
Leo Famulari skribis:
> This patches fixes an integer overflow in libgd:
>
> https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-7568
> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q3/639
>
> From b125d20c4e60cfd204a99fd7df174de73df067a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Leo Famulari
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep
Hello,
this patch is gsound library required for gnome-clocks application.
Built and linted.
Thank youFrom 1d8368a12295c223626a3638d45e50a2043b980c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rene Saavedra
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 07:17:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add gsound.
* gnu/packages/gsound.scm
Hello,
this patch is gnome-clocks application.
Built, linted and tested.
Thank youFrom fd784203294523120f09312ffe9699a4983e6156 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rene Saavedra
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 07:22:39 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add gnome-clocks.
* gnu/packages/gnome-clocks.scm (gnome-c
If I'm not mistaken, translations of the GNU GPL are not legally binding
if they are presented by themselves.
One must note that when the translation text is preceded by a section
written in the license's original language that instructs the reader to
take the original one as valid, then the proje
Thank you for the info @Leo and @Ludo, just noticed that it's
mentioned in the manual.
One question that wasn't answered yet in your description and the
manual is how the linter detects when a package is patched. I assume
it looks at the applied patch names see if they contain a CVE code?
I **guess** that restriction on modifying the GPL was made because of
the problem of license proliferation that could arise from translations
not accepted as such (that is: not accepted as translations).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Adonay Felipe Nogueira writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> If I'm not mistaken, translations of the GNU GPL are not legally binding
> if they are presented by themselves.
>
> One must note that when the translation text is preceded by a section
> written in the license's original language th
Hi Ben,
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
> From c61c799da21f349c739f9d094d348ae429a91ffc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ben Woodcroft
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 22:44:55 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: perl: Use configure-flags.
>
> * gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl)[arguments]: Use configure-flags.
[...]
John Darrington writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> The GPL itself is not Free (!)
>
> It's license is:
>
> "Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
> of this license document, but changing it is not allowed."
>
> PLUS some extra permissions regarding translation whi
宋文武 (2016-10-01 10:59:14 +0800) wrote:
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer writes:
>
> > Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (2016-09-21 11:18:47 +0200) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, this is my third try at packaging [quickswitch][] for the i3
> >> window manager. […]
> >>
> >> [quickswitch]: https://github.com/proxypoke/quicks
* gnu/packages/haskell.scm
(ghc-streaming-commons)[propagated-inputs]: Move ghc-random...
[inputs]: ...to here; remove ghc-async, add ghc-directory, add
ghc-transformers; move ghc-quickcheck, ghc-hspec...
[native-inputs]: ...to here; add hspec-discover.
(ghc-test-framework)[propagated-inputs]: Mov
* gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-process)[arguments]: Add phases
"patch-reference-to-/bin/sh" to replace reference to /bin/sh.
---
gnu/packages/haskell.scm | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
index d79dfd6..cf17c4f 100644
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 02:20:35PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
>
> > This patches fixes an integer overflow in libgd:
> >
> > https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-7568
> > http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q3/639
> >
> > From b125d20c4e60cfd204a99fd7df1
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 09:45:21AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I’m preparing a patch to remove propagation from all Haskell packages.
> Now the question is only whether to do this all in one patch or in one
> patch per package… :)
I'd say whichever method is easiest :) And then we can test it w
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 02:19:05PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
> > An aside, the CVE linter gives false positives for grafted packages. For
> > example, try `guix lint -c cve openssl@1.0`.
>
> That’s been annoying me for some time so I’d like to see if we can
> improve g
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 03:22:36PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I pushed simplified versions of these two patches as
> 56ee1d2015e9b2c55d34f19c70b06eefe8a20c76 and
> 156c0810e936413ac554e2883343b3b40695cfdc.
>
> I think this was the last non-bug-fix change for this core-updates
> cycle. :-)
C
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> * gnu/packages/haskell.scm
> (ghc-streaming-commons)[propagated-inputs]: Move ghc-random...
> [inputs]: ...to here; remove ghc-async, add ghc-directory, add
> ghc-transformers; move ghc-quickcheck, ghc-hspec...
> [native-inputs]: ...to here; add hspec-discover.
>
> (ghc-t
This is a depend of Krita.
From 808b47b3b7a9d769f3a6a873d19a0051f64720f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leo Famulari
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:38:20 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add Vc.
* gnu/packages/maths.scm (vc): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/maths.scm | 34 ++
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 06:24:12PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> This is a depend of Krita.
... dependency
> From 808b47b3b7a9d769f3a6a873d19a0051f64720f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Leo Famulari
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:38:20 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add Vc.
>
> * gnu/packages/math
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:50:09AM +, ng0 wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add libkqueue.
>
> * gnu/local.mk: Include gnu/packages/libdispatch.scm .
> * gnu/packages/libdispatch.scm: Add new file.
> * gnu/packages/libdispatch.scm (libkqueue): New variable.
LGTM
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] gnu:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:38:07AM +, ng0 wrote:
> * gnu/packages/psyc.scm: New file.
> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
> +(source
> + (origin
> + (method url-fetch)
> + (uri (string-append "http://perl.psyc.eu/";
> + "perlpsyc-" versi
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:58:29AM +, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:46:31PM +, ng0 wrote:
> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add psyclpc.
> >>
> >> * gnu/packages/psyc.scm (psyclpc): New variable.
> >> +(inputs
> >> + `(("zlib" ,zlib)
> >> + (
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 01:02:04PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>
> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (sunxi-tools): New variable.
What's the story with the 'bin/' [0] directory? I'm not familiar with
these file types.
The tarball includes:
bin/fel-pio.bin
bin/fel-pio.nm
bin/fel-sdboot.sunxi
bin/jt
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:35:04AM +, ng0 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for reviewing this.
>
> Should I wait until the updates to the python buildsystem harmut sent
> are merged? Including this now would require one more set of python2
> packages to be changed.
> I want this off my todo list and t
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> this is a patch-series fixing bug 20765.
>
> Bug 20765 is about problems caused by python packages being installed as
> "zipped eggs" (basically these are zip-files).
Thanks for taking this on!
I will read it more thoroughly tomor
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 10:27:54PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> > this is a patch-series fixing bug 20765.
> >
> > Bug 20765 is about problems caused by python packages being installed as
> > "zipped eggs" (basically these are zip-f
34 matches
Mail list logo
