Re: bug#74736: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

2025-02-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Divya, Divya Ranjan skribis: > Glad that we've finalized the GCD! Really happy to see it. But is it that > you've missed my "I support" or that my name is not there in /etc/teams.scm? > I just did a search in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736 and found that I had > sent a "I support" on

Re: bug#74736: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

2025-01-17 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Simon Tournier skribis: >> Perhaps the “Decision Making” section could stress that, with a >> paragraph above “To learn …” along these lines: >> >> Consensus building requires that participants share a common goal, >> trust each other to act in good faith, listen to one another’s >> concern

Re: bug#74736: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

2025-01-16 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 17:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Concerning consensus, I am mildly worried about deadlocks (including >> when trying to modify this RFC/GCD). What happens if some person insists >> on disapproving? > > This is a general question about consensus building. I agree. >

Re: bug#74736: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

2025-01-16 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Andreas Enge skribis: > Concerning consensus, I am mildly worried about deadlocks (including > when trying to modify this RFC/GCD). What happens if some person insists > on disapproving? This is a general question about consensus building. For the situation you describe not to happen,