Hello! Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis:
> Concerning consensus, I am mildly worried about deadlocks (including > when trying to modify this RFC/GCD). What happens if some person insists > on disapproving? This is a general question about consensus building. For the situation you describe not to happen, the “conditions for consensus” must be meant, as explained for instance in: https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus#conditions Perhaps the “Decision Making” section could stress that, with a paragraph above “To learn …” along these lines: Consensus building requires that participants share a common goal, trust each other to act in good faith, listen to one another’s concerns to take them into account, and are committed to donating enough of their time to achieve it. A deliberating member who “insists on disapproving”, without proposing alternative paths, wouldn’t meet these requirements. I believe right now people who become team members or committers have already demonstrated these abilities. I think this is where these expectations should be clarified and agreed upon. Ludo’.
