Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> skribis: >> Perhaps the “Decision Making” section could stress that, with a >> paragraph above “To learn …” along these lines: >> >> Consensus building requires that participants share a common goal, >> trust each other to act in good faith, listen to one another’s >> concerns to take them into account, and are committed to donating >> enough of their time to achieve it. > > To me, this paragraph would be redundant with this other paragraph: > > Thus, no decision is made against significant concerns; these concerns > are actively resolved through counter proposals. A deliberating > member > disapproving a proposal bears a responsibility for finding > alternatives, > proposing ideas or code, or explaining the rationale for the status > quo. > > >> A deliberating member who “insists on disapproving”, without proposing >> alternative paths, wouldn’t meet these requirements. > > Yes and I think that already included in the paragraph above, no?
Yes, looks like it. Ludo’.
