Ludo',
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
sirgazil skribis:
Oh yeah, I'm not suggesting to translate "system names", but
have both
"system names" and "pretty names", and only the latter would be
internationalized :)
But even that is not really feasible: often there’s no “pretty
name”,
sometimes there’
El 31/03/19 a las 3:31 p. m., Ludovic Courtès escribió:
sirgazil skribis:
El 31/03/19 a las 11:37 a. m., Ludovic Courtès escribió:
Hi sirgazil,
sirgazil skribis:
I don't know exactly what should be done in Guix, though, but I think
having a "system name" and a "pretty name" that is transl
sirgazil skribis:
> El 31/03/19 a las 11:37 a. m., Ludovic Courtès escribió:
>> Hi sirgazil,
>>
>> sirgazil skribis:
>>
>>> I don't know exactly what should be done in Guix, though, but I think
>>> having a "system name" and a "pretty name" that is translatable could
>>> help a little bit.
>>
>>
El 31/03/19 a las 11:37 a. m., Ludovic Courtès escribió:
Hi sirgazil,
sirgazil skribis:
I don't know exactly what should be done in Guix, though, but I think
having a "system name" and a "pretty name" that is translatable could
help a little bit.
It’s a tricky topic indeed (and not speci
Hi sirgazil,
sirgazil skribis:
> I don't know exactly what should be done in Guix, though, but I think
> having a "system name" and a "pretty name" that is translatable could
> help a little bit.
It’s a tricky topic indeed (and not specific to Guix).
There are i18n and accessibility (a11n) iss
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Andreas Enge skribis:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:02:00PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
I still think this change should be reverted
>>>
>>> I also think so.
>>
>> I’d also be in favor of reverting.
>
> I’m also in favour.
El 29/03/19 a las 11:42 a. m., Ludovic Courtès escribió:
[...]
Packages usually have a “system name” (that’s the terminology used on
Savannah) and a “pretty name”, like ‘guix’ and ‘GNU Guix’. I believe
the intent of those guidelines was to suggest keeping the system name,
not the fancy name.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Andreas Enge skribis:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:02:00PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>>> I still think this change should be reverted
>>
>> I also think so.
>
> I’d also be in favor of reverting.
I’m also in favour. A pure revert would not be enough, th
Hello,
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:02:00PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>> I still think this change should be reverted
>
> I also think so.
I’d also be in favor of reverting.
I mean perhaps some of the renames may be less controversial than
others, but it looks l
