On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:16:08PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> Andreas Enge writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> >> > Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too
> >> > old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> > Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too
>> > old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development
>> > network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and
>> > gn
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too
> > old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development
> > network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and
> > gnunet-gtk, I would just make g
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Nils Gillmann writes:
>
>> I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have
>> to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet, as 0.10.1 is
>> really old. Stable, but old.. Which possibly could affect the
>> experience for people who try to use gnunet n
Nils Gillmann writes:
> I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have
> to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet, as 0.10.1 is
> really old. Stable, but old.. Which possibly could affect the
> experience for people who try to use gnunet now, before any
> applications l
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:48:03PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> Following later this week:
>
> gnunet + gnunet-gtk SVN, co-authored work with Jookia.
>
> I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have
> to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet, as 0.10.1 is
> really old
Following later this week:
gnunet + gnunet-gtk SVN, co-authored work with Jookia.
I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have
to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet, as 0.10.1 is
really old. Stable, but old.. Which possibly could affect the
experience for people who
This should fix the problem we Ricardo reported to gnunet-devel
in [GNUNET-developers] gnunet-gtk segfaults and other issues or
at least fix part of the problem.
It should add a reference to GNUnet to our gnunet-gtk
(--with-gnunet= ...), but still does not fix:
"checking for Glade core... --with-g
