Marek Benc skribis:
> From e101c036615bb22b05744789fbc0f5ddb7f71413 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marek Benc
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:08:16 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: nvi: Fix Berkely DB compatability issues.
>
> * gnu/packages/patches/nvi-db4.patch: New file.
> * gnu/packages/patches/n
On 01/22/2015 09:52 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Marek Benc skribis:
On 01/22/2015 05:05 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Marek Benc skribis:
On 01/21/2015 04:03 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I agree with Andreas: there are 20 patches, and that level of patching
goes beyond our mission, IMO.
I wou
Marek Benc skribis:
> On 01/22/2015 05:05 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Marek Benc skribis:
>>
>>> On 01/21/2015 04:03 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I agree with Andreas: there are 20 patches, and that level of patching
goes beyond our mission, IMO.
I would rather leave it as is
On 01/22/2015 05:39 PM, Marek Benc wrote:
psize = ((sb.st_size / 15) + 1023) / 1024;
if (psize >= 8) psize=8<<10;
else if (psize >= 4) psize=4<<10;
else if (psize >= 2) psize=2<<10;
else psize=1<<10;
psize *= 1024;
Oops, ignore the last line, it's a typo on my end and not a problem of
On 01/22/2015 05:05 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Marek Benc skribis:
On 01/21/2015 04:03 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I agree with Andreas: there are 20 patches, and that level of patching
goes beyond our mission, IMO.
I would rather leave it as is if it’s usable, or remove it, or point to
a ne
Marek Benc skribis:
> On 01/21/2015 04:03 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I agree with Andreas: there are 20 patches, and that level of patching
>> goes beyond our mission, IMO.
>>
>> I would rather leave it as is if it’s usable, or remove it, or point to
>> a new upstream if there is one.
>
> In t
On 01/21/2015 04:03 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I agree with Andreas: there are 20 patches, and that level of patching
goes beyond our mission, IMO.
I would rather leave it as is if it’s usable, or remove it, or point to
a new upstream if there is one.
In that case, I think at least two of the
Marek Benc skribis:
> On 01/21/2015 10:35 AM, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> The number of patches looks quite frightening. From the README of nvi, the
>> current version dates from 2007. Now if upstream is dead and does not fix
>> patches, it might be preferable to remove the package altogether. Is ther
On 01/21/2015 10:35 AM, Andreas Enge wrote:
The number of patches looks quite frightening. From the README of nvi, the
current version dates from 2007. Now if upstream is dead and does not fix
patches, it might be preferable to remove the package altogether. Is there no
viable alternative that i
The number of patches looks quite frightening. From the README of nvi, the
current version dates from 2007. Now if upstream is dead and does not fix
patches, it might be preferable to remove the package altogether. Is there no
viable alternative that is still alive? Or vim in legacy mode?
Andreas
10 matches
Mail list logo
