Marek Benc <merku...@gmail.com> skribis: > On 01/21/2015 04:03 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> I agree with Andreas: there are 20 patches, and that level of patching >> goes beyond our mission, IMO. >> >> I would rather leave it as is if it’s usable, or remove it, or point to >> a new upstream if there is one. > > In that case, I think at least two of the patches should be allowed to > get in, the ones about the Berkely db library, since it's spewing out > errors without them. (but the editor itself works)
You mean there are run-time errors without nvi-db4.patch? What kind? The second patch is about page sizes apparently. Do you know what the deal is? Two/three patches would be OK, but we need to have an understanding of why we’re carrying these particular patches. Thank you! Ludo’.
