Re: [PATCH] Add LAPACKE

2016-07-17 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Andreas Enge writes: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:22:12PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> “guix refresh -l lapack” shows me that 51 packages are affected, which >> results in a rebuild of 86 dependent packages. Okay to push to master? > > I would do so. Okay. I’ve pushed the change. ~~ Ricar

Re: [PATCH] Add LAPACKE

2016-07-14 Thread Andreas Enge
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:22:12PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > “guix refresh -l lapack” shows me that 51 packages are affected, which > results in a rebuild of 86 dependent packages. Okay to push to master? I would do so. Andreas

Re: [PATCH] Add LAPACKE

2016-07-13 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi! > > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> here's an alternative to the patch provided here: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-06/msg00099.html >> >> Instead of building LAPACKE as part of the lapack package this patch adds a >> new package "lapack

Re: [PATCH] Add LAPACKE

2016-07-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > here's an alternative to the patch provided here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-06/msg00099.html > > Instead of building LAPACKE as part of the lapack package this patch adds a > new package "lapack-with-lapacke". I did this because an

Re: [PATCH] Add LAPACKE

2016-07-12 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Instead of building LAPACKE as part of the lapack package this patch adds a >> new package "lapack-with-lapacke". I did this because an increase in closure >> size of 20MiB is a little much for a commonly used package, in my opinion. >> >> A

Re: [PATCH] Add LAPACKE

2016-07-11 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Andreas Enge writes: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:40:07PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> A third option would be to move LAPACKE to its own output. > > if this is easily possible, I think this option would be more elegant. A patch is attached. It produces two output directories: /gnu/store

Re: [PATCH] Add LAPACKE

2016-07-11 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Instead of building LAPACKE as part of the lapack package this patch adds a > new package "lapack-with-lapacke". I did this because an increase in closure > size of 20MiB is a little much for a commonly used package, in my opinion. > > A third option would be to move LA

[PATCH] Add LAPACKE

2016-07-08 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Guix, here's an alternative to the patch provided here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-06/msg00099.html Instead of building LAPACKE as part of the lapack package this patch adds a new package "lapack-with-lapacke". I did this because an increase in closure size of 20M