Hi! Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:
> here's an alternative to the patch provided here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-06/msg00099.html > > Instead of building LAPACKE as part of the lapack package this patch adds a > new package "lapack-with-lapacke". I did this because an increase in closure > size of 20MiB is a little much for a commonly used package, in my opinion. The 20 MiB increase shown in the message above correspond mostly to gcc:lib, which is present anyway, so I would say it’s acceptable. WDYT? Ludo’.
