Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > Hi! > > Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis: > >> here's an alternative to the patch provided here: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-06/msg00099.html >> >> Instead of building LAPACKE as part of the lapack package this patch adds a >> new package "lapack-with-lapacke". I did this because an increase in closure >> size of 20MiB is a little much for a commonly used package, in my opinion. > > The 20MiB increase shown in the message above correspond mostly to > gcc:lib, which is present anyway, so I would say it’s acceptable.
Well, in this case I’ll just apply Dave’s patch then (see email in the ML archive). “guix refresh -l lapack” shows me that 51 packages are affected, which results in a rebuild of 86 dependent packages. Okay to push to master? ~~ Ricardo
