I accept.
I support.
I did note thoughtful comments from some people who support the goal of
renaming but have concerns about implementation specifics. I hope constructive
suggestions to improve implementation will be welcome (though I don't have any
myself), but I especially support making this change n
I support
Em 30 de abril de 2025 18:55:12 BRT, "Gábor Boskovits"
escreveu:
>Hello,
>[...]
>
>For me it looks ok.
>
>I see two further alternatives:
>1. Create a patch from the commits that fix the issue and add that on
>top of the latest release (I would avoid this)
>2. Ping the project, so that they relea
Hello,
Gabriel Santos ezt Ãrta (idÅ‘pont:
2025. ápr. 30., Sze, 22:31):
>
> Em 30 de abril de 2025 07:28:11 BRT, "Cayetano Santos via Development of GNU
> Guix and the GNU System distribution." escreveu:
> >
> >I’ve been playing a bit with emacs-team branch after #78095 (and
> >previous emacs-bui
>mer. 30 avril 2025 at 21:23, Liliana Marie Prikler
>wrote:
> For context, are these all packages that still fail to build? If so, I
> think it'd be time for a merge request unless someone wants to tackle
> emms first.
No, this is not it all. I had to stop before my old laptop burns.
Let me
Em 30 de abril de 2025 07:28:11 BRT, "Cayetano Santos via Development of GNU
Guix and the GNU System distribution." escreveu:
>
>I’ve been playing a bit with emacs-team branch after #78095 (and
>previous emacs-build-system manifest).
>
>This is a (preliminary) list of packages still needing some
>For context, are these all packages that still fail to build? If so, I
>think it'd be time for a merge request unless someone wants to tackle
>emms first.
It seems so. Either at the "build" phase or "check" phase. I'm going through
each of them and commenting what I know.
--
Gabriel Santos
Em 30 de abril de 2025 07:28:11 BRT, "Cayetano Santos via Development of GNU
Guix and the GNU System distribution." escreveu:
>
>I’ve been playing a bit with emacs-team branch after #78095 (and
>previous emacs-build-system manifest).
>
>This is a (preliminary) list of packages still needing some
Am Mittwoch, dem 30.04.2025 um 14:54 -0300 schrieb Gabriel Santos:
> Em 30 de abril de 2025 07:28:11 BRT, "Cayetano Santos via Development
> of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
> escreveu:
> >
> > I’ve been playing a bit with emacs-team branch after #78095 (and
> > previous emacs-build-
Em 30 de abril de 2025 07:28:11 BRT, "Cayetano Santos via Development of GNU
Guix and the GNU System distribution." escreveu:
>
>I’ve been playing a bit with emacs-team branch after #78095 (and
>previous emacs-build-system manifest).
>
>This is a (preliminary) list of packages still needing some
I disapprove.
On 21 April 2025 14:07:14 GMT, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
>Hi Guix,
>
>as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion
>period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some
>changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg
Hi Simon,
qua 23 abr 2025 Ã s 17:44:39 (1745441079), zimon.touto...@gmail.com enviou:
> Hi Vagrant, all,
>
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 at 11:58, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
> > The nature of (at least some of) those responses were largely a negation
> > that left little room to discuss how to move forw
I’ve been playing a bit with emacs-team branch after #78095 (and
previous emacs-build-system manifest).
This is a (preliminary) list of packages still needing some tweaks
before we are able to built it all and are ready to merge (and move to
emacs 30 !!):
export
SKIP_PACKAGES=cedille:emacs-gnos
For the record, I have
(repair #t)
on my root fs in config.scm, and even that doesn't help.
I think the solution is: We need to update e2fsprogs to 1.47.2. It has
multiple fixes for orphans, including for filesystem corruption (!).
I've thus updated e2fsprogs to 1.47.2 on guix master.
Bef
15 matches
Mail list logo
