Hi, is there another way to answer the questions for those who block JavaScript
or use EWW browser? Maybe you could send me the questions in an e-mail?
--
Christopher Howard
Hi,
Does the GNU Shepherd add entries for shutdowns and reboots to utmp? [1]
Kind regards
Felix
P.S. I'd like to teach guile-pam some new tricks.
[1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/systemd-update-utmp.service.8.html
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, at 7:50 PM, Divya Ranjan wrote:
> > I think it would be appropriate if each "next" package had a code comment,
> > or perhaps an addendum to its package description, describing how it
> > relates to the main packaged version.
>
> I think the whole "next" category is problem
Hello Ryan,
> I think it would be appropriate if each "next" package had a code comment, or
> perhaps an addendum to its package description, describing how it relates to
> the main packaged version.
I think the whole "next" category is problematic. Why not just have a version
number of that p
Cayetano Santos via Guix-patches via writes:
> I’m just curious about whether guix has a policy concerning this kind of
> situation, before reviewing your patch (#74231), as there might have
> consequences in the most general case. Namely, it is the case of
> patching a package definition, redire
Good morning,
I recently attempted to lint a package declaration I've been working on,
and it warned about disarchive.guix.gnu.org's SSL certificate. Seems
that it expired on October 12, as best as I can tell. Fortunately,
`lookup-disarchive-spec' uses other mirrors, so linting works, though I
wi
Original Message
On 11/11/24 9:10 AM, Divya Ranjan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As someone who’s been recently involved in packaging some software for GNU
> Guix I’m confused with certain choices, mostly with the [package]-next
> category. What should these next packages be?
As y
Hello,
As someone who’s been recently involved in packaging some software for GNU Guix
I’m confused with certain choices, mostly with the [package]-next category.
What should these next packages be? "More recent" than the non-next package? If
so, how much more recent? One release ahead? Or is i
Thanks for the improved Shepherd! One issue so far:
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> The tarball and signature are available at:
>
> https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/shepherd/shepherd-1.0.0rc1.tar.gz
> SHA256: 3ce5d60e528d4cfb282b1f271a601256395b28f16e41be6052cf5945f687b004
>
> https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu
Hi,
If you've a few minutes please take the User and Contributor survey:
https://guix.limesurvey.net/
If you select 'Contributor' there's a section for using Guix (I'm sure we all
use Guix!) and then an additional section for Contributors.
If you decide not to complete all questions that's fi
Luis Felipe writes:
> On 4/11/24 22:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Luis Felipe skribis:
>>
>>> Hi guix,
>>>
>>> The software behind https://packages.guix.gnu.org/, Guix Packages
>>> Website,¹ has been updated with the following changes:
>> Yay!
>>
>> Could you send a patch against th
11 matches
Mail list logo
