Hi Ekaitz,
Social diversity not being an engineering problem is really my point. The point
is not to have diversity reach a certain numeric threshold but strive to be as
socially diverse as possible I believe.
We don't need an unit of measure to be sure of analyzing diversity without
bias, we
"Thompson, David" writes:
> Changing GNU/FSF from the inside has been a losing strategy for at
> least a decade, as a conservative estimate. Nothing has meaningfully
> changed for the better and the situation continues to deteriorate both
> socially and infrastructurally.
Since I am unaware, for
On 2024-10-27 22:31, Thompson, David wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 3:13 PM Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Many people on this project have tried to change GNU from the inside and
are very critical with the FSF (see the https://gnu.tools/). I think
that's also a good way to do things, changing them fro
On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 3:13 PM Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
>
> Many people on this project have tried to change GNU from the inside and
> are very critical with the FSF (see the https://gnu.tools/). I think
> that's also a good way to do things, changing them from the inside.
> Fixing them for all our
On 2024-10-27 19:12, paul wrote:
Hi Ekaitz,
On 10/27/24 11:47, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Hi,
On 2024-10-27 11:00, indieterminacy wrote:
> I think a useful measurement of any community is the diversity
within it.
I do think we are a pretty diverse group.
But it all comes to what you consider di
On 2024-10-26 17:08, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nicolas Graves skribis:
>
>> I was wondering about handling a cpe-vendor property to handle such
>> cases, since cpe-name won't help here.
>
> Yes, we need that. (guix cve) currently blissfully ignores the “vendor”
> part of CPE names; we can
Hi Juliana,
Juliana Sims writes:
> After a turbulent few months, I have an exciting announcement about
> the Goblins Shepherd port -- the design document has reached (initial)
> completion! [1]
Congrats! The design document was an excellent & enjoyable read, looking
forward to the actual implem
Hi Ekaitz,
On 10/27/24 11:47, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Hi,
On 2024-10-27 11:00, indieterminacy wrote:
> I think a useful measurement of any community is the diversity
within it.
I do think we are a pretty diverse group.
But it all comes to what you consider diverse. Some people brought
this c
Am Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 04:14:24PM +0100 schrieb Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli:
> I'll try to reproduce that with matterbridge. I assume that it's OK if
> I add you in the list of reviewers if/when I get something ready.
$ ./etc/teams.scm show go
id: go
name: Go team
description:
scope:
+ gnu/packages/c
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 23:11:17 +0100
Sharlatan Hellseher wrote:
> Take a look at the current effort of unbundle (gnu packages ipfs) -
> kubo. Bit by bit and we nearly unweaved the rainbow.
Thanks a lot, that was the part that I lacked. I assumed I needed to do
all 500 at once because go didn't prov
Hi,
Thanks for that eloquent and considerate reply.
I reckon in many respects the Guix community is fighting the good fight.
In some respects, your referring back to hackerspaces reinforces my
feeling that that is an example where they need greater attention (and
that our onus is not to solve
Hi,
On 2024-10-27 11:00, indieterminacy wrote:
> I think a useful measurement of any community is the diversity within it.
I do think we are a pretty diverse group.
But it all comes to what you consider diverse. Some people brought this
conversation during the Guix Days, probably ignoring the
Hello Ekaitz,
On 2024-10-27 02:01, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Hi Juliana,
I like some of the points you do here: we should encourage committers
to review patches, and give commit access to those that are focused on
that.
On the other hand, I disagree with your message about GNU and the FSF.
Fir
13 matches
Mail list logo
