Re: Transformations Shell Syntax

Hi Ludo, Is there any interest in having a syntax for shepherd for controlling multiple workers? >>> Excerpt from https://blog.miguelgrinberg.com/post/running-a-flask-application-as-a-service-with-systemd Now I can start four workers using brace expansion in bash: $ sudo systemctl daemon-

Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks

"W. T. Meyer" writes: > However, the download speed from the official substitute servers is > noticeable slower; but that's to be expected considering the resources^1 > NixOS is allocating towards their binary/build caching efforts. I’ve found download speeds to vary wildly dependent on where

Re: Stable endpoint to fetch guix binary

Hi, André A. Gomes skribis: > The latest Guix binaries can be fetched via > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search/latest/archive?query=spec:tarball+status:success+system:x86_64-linux+guix-binary.tar.xz > > However, this doesn't always work. For instance, as of now, it returns > error 502. There’s n

Re: Scheduled monthly update for (gnu packages astronomy)

Hi, Sharlatan Hellseher skribis: > As you may noticed Guix's collection for astro[physics|nomy] is growing! > > It is about 70+ packaged projects just in (gnu packages astronomy), and I > try to prepare more for review, sourcing, mainly, from Debian astro and > tracking the progress in the chann

Re: Guix / Nix Benchmarks

Hi, Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." skribis: > Then the "best" actual comparison might be the one done by Andrew Tropin > a few years ago, right here : > https://gist.github.com/abcdw/e54807b0a25e61fe2cf1bf8991410f83 > > Maybe we could get in touch w

Re: Packaging Con

Hi! Peter Polidoro skribis: > Any Guix talks planned for Packaging Con? > > https://cfp.packaging-con.org/2023/cfp I think it’d be great to have a presence there! I don’t plan to submit a talk but I think quite a few people have interesting things to say—bootstrapping, Rust packaging, RISC-V p

Overruling and blocking

Hi! Maxime Devos skribis: > Op 12-06-2023 om 03:17 schreef Maxim Cournoyer: [...] >>> Actually, I started out with the non-gradual approach, but that was >>> overruled by Ludo', IIRC. >> Did you perhaps meant to say that it was disagreed with, or at worst >> "blocked by"? > > Yes. Overruling

Re: shepherd respawn frequency

Hi Ludo', On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 1:01 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > We could do that. Without advocating that the Shepherd draw any inspiration from systemd, please allow me to mention, sotto-voce, that the default may be 100 milliseconds over there. [1] Kind regards Felix [1] https://www.fre

Re: shepherd respawn frequency

Hi! Attila Lendvai skribis: > would the shepherd maintaners (looking at you Ludo :) accept a change that > introduces a new field into called RESPAWN-DELAY, and issue a fiber > sleep in RESPAWN-SERVICE when it is not #false, and the daemon process quits > unexpectedly? We could do that. It

Re: Transformations Shell Syntax

HI, John Kehayias skribis: > As one who also would like a shorter syntax option, here's a quick thought: > what about a short version of what we have for when there is only one package > given or it can be applied to all packages/be a positional argument? An > example is perhaps best, so what

Re: Guidelines for pre-trained ML model weight binaries (Was re: Where should we put machine learning model parameters?)

Hi, Simon Tournier skribis: > Somehow, if we do not have guidelines for helping in deciding, it makes > harder the review of #63088 [1] asking the inclusion of lc0 or it makes > hard to know what to do about GNU Backgamon. > > On these specific cases, what do we do? :-) Someone™ has to invest t

Re: Branch (and team?) for mesa updates

Hello, Am Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 06:25:04PM + schrieb John Kehayias: > Master can be merged into this branch just prior to a patches going to this > branch with the expectation merging back to master will be soon after and > changes are only affecting packages that won't be touched on master a