Hi! Maxime Devos <maximede...@telenet.be> skribis:
> Op 12-06-2023 om 03:17 schreef Maxim Cournoyer: [...] >>> Actually, I started out with the non-gradual approach, but that was >>> overruled by Ludo', IIRC. >> Did you perhaps meant to say that it was disagreed with, or at worst >> "blocked by"? > > Yes. Overruling is a form of blocking, and blocking by authority > (whether de facto or de jure) is overruling. [...] > In my experience, Ludovic often doesn't actually practice that, though. > For example, the thread of the patch you sent at > <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/51427> is a good example of this, pretty > much everyone (except Ludo') agreed that the provided patch is good. I take note of your criticism (even if it’s a bit hard on me after all these years working with people). For the record, I do think that, willingly or not, I am (and some other people too) in a position to encourage or discourage initiatives: by expressing enthusiasm, skepticism, or not responding. When I foresee technical issues about proposals, I try to be explicit about what I think those issues might be. I’d be happy to read suggestions on how to improve on that. Ludo’.
