Hi! Attila Lendvai <att...@lendvai.name> skribis:
> would the shepherd maintaners (looking at you Ludo :) accept a change that > introduces a new field into <service> called RESPAWN-DELAY, and issue a fiber > sleep in RESPAWN-SERVICE when it is not #false, and the daemon process quits > unexpectedly? We could do that. It never occurred to me that this is something one would want to have though. My reasoning is that if you mark a service as respawnable, then you really want it to be respawned as soon as it fails, not 5 seconds later. Do you have a motivating example in mind (a daemon) to share? Thanks, Ludo’.
