Alex Sassmannshausen writes:
> Hello,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Leo Famulari skribis:
>>>
All kidding aside, I'm happy to push this with PulseAudio support, *if*
a GuixSD user can confirm that it works. I don't have sound on my GuixSD
install
On 15 February 2016 at 03:13, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Thanks for the report! I pushed a change that lists the handful of gpl2+
> files and names both licenses.
Even better... I didn't realise that was an option.
Thanks!
T G-R
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Thompson, David writes:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Christopher Allan Webber
>> wrote:
>>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>>
Pjotr Prins skribis:
> Patch b24765139c8940541b23f84592d3580d53f71d71
>
> (define-public sqlite
>(pac
I'm packaging emacs-popup.
Currently the output builds with
niasterisk@khazad-dum ~/projects/guix_project/guix$ ls -al
/gnu/store/knpjk9vflja0i6yhnz4ai57k29jpgm4p-emacs-popup-0.5.3/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/popup-0.5.3/
total 180
dr-xr-xr-x 4 root guixbuild 4096 Jan 1 1970 ./
dr-xr-xr-x 3 r
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 02:47:43AM +0100, tobias.geerinckx.r...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hullo,
>
> It was pointed out to me that the current licence (‘gpl2+’) for
> btrfs-progs is just wrong and should be ‘gpl2’ instead.
>
> I must have opened one of the few gpl2+-licenced files in the tarball
> by sh
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:41:29PM -0300, Daniel Pimentel wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I try to change Ratpoison to Gnome-shell, but there's a follow error with
> test for NetworkManager:
>
> Testsuite summary for NetworkManager 1.0.6
> ===
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 01:21:26AM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> attached is font terminus update to 4.40
>
> From 287b0632001136f6be63dcb6989e0179915d70b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nils Gillmann
> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:15:55 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: font-terminus: Update to 4.40
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (btrfs-progs)[license]: Use 'gpl2'.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 6b26feb..dab68c4 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b
Hullo,
It was pointed out to me that the current licence (‘gpl2+’) for
btrfs-progs is just wrong and should be ‘gpl2’ instead.
I must have opened one of the few gpl2+-licenced files in the tarball
by sheer bad luck. Here is a patch to set things right.
Kind regards,
T G-R
(I struggled to write
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python2-enum34): New variable.
(python2-cryptography)[propagated-inputs]: Add python2-enum34.
(python-cryptography)[propagated-inputs]: Remove python-enum34.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-parse-type)[inputs]: Remove python-enum34.
(behave)[inputs]: Likewise.
* gnu/packages/docker.scm (docker-compose)[inputs]: Likewise.
---
gnu/packages/docker.scm | 1 -
gnu/packages/python.scm | 4 +---
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-enum34)[inputs]: Remove
python-setuptools.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 9296cdf..66f911d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-enum34): Update to 1.1.0.
[source]: Use pypi-uri.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 2924237..3e712fc 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+
Python-enum34 backports some features of Python 3.4 to earlier versions
of Python.
We now package python-3.4, so I think it's unnecessary to use it in our
python-3 packages.
This patch series
1) Updates python-3.4 to the latest version that builds with our system.
2) Adds a python2-variant and
On 15/02/16 10:47, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
On 15/02/16 03:49, Justus Winter wrote:
* gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add new patch.
* gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (genometools): New variable.
* gnu/packages/patches/genometools-fix-testsuite.patch: New file.
---
gnu-system.am
Hi,
I think you're asking "What is the difference between Guix and GuixSD", and
you don't feel that the manual is clear enough about this. Is that right?
If so, how do you feel the manual could be improved?
I'm not yet a Guix/GuixSD expert, but in a nutshell, it seems to me that
the biggest diffe
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello,
>
> finally I tried out GuixSD on a spare machine, and I must say, I am impressed!
>
> I have two questions concerning the artwork; I did a "guix pull" before
> reconfiguring, so these should concern the current state:
> - The logo on the grub screen has a checkerboar
I hope to switch my home servers from Debian 8 to NixOS or GuixSD. Once
that is working, I hope to convince the system managers at work to
install Nix or Guix.
I started experimenting with Nix and NixOS 6 weeks ago. 3 weeks ago I
switched my focus to Guix and installed guixSD on one of my servers
attached is font terminus update to 4.40
>From 287b0632001136f6be63dcb6989e0179915d70b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Gillmann
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:15:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: font-terminus: Update to 4.40
* gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-terminus): Update to 4.40.
---
gnu/packag
Great work!
Thanks :)
--
Daniel Pimentel (d4n1)
Quoting Justus Winter (2016-02-14 18:19:35)
> I'll send a follow-up.
Eww, that went bad :(
Furthermore, the application bundles some libraries, I need to take
care of that first.
I'll send a revised patch soonish...
Justus
Hi Guix,
I try to change Ratpoison to Gnome-shell, but there's a follow error
with test for NetworkManager:
Testsuite summary for NetworkManager 1.0.6
# TOTAL: 24
# PASS: 16
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 0
# XPASS:
Hi,
I ran those commands, and it fixed the problem: /dev/disk/by-uuid now
exists and contains the links I expected to see.
However, it introduced a new problem. Now, my network interface eth0
does not show up like it did before. For example, when I run ifconfig,
"lo" shows up but "eth0" is missin
Nils Gillmann writes:
> open("SYSATOMS", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
> directory)
> write(2, "Can't open 'SYSATOMS'\n", 22Can't open 'SYSATOMS'
> ) = 22
> exit_group(1) = ?
> +++ exited with 1 +++
Does this also happen when you run lispf4 from
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Nils Gillmann writes:
>
>> Efraim Flashner writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:31:51 +0100
>>> Nils Gillmann wrote:
>>>
Leo Famulari writes:
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
>>
On 13/02/16 22:41, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 04:07:55PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (vcsh): New variable.
>
> [...]
>
>> +(arguments
>> + `(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> + (delete 'configure)
>>
It's been pointed out in the past that Qt [0] bundles many other softare
distributions, making it more difficult to fully apply security updates.
One would have to *know* what software was bundled and be sure to update
the bundled copy along with the standalone copy.
I asked for guidance on #qt [2
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:48:32PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 06:10:17PM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> > > (native-inputs
> > > `(("python-setuptools-scm" ,python-setuptools-scm)))
> > >
> > > (define-public python2-execnet
> > > (package
> > > (
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:22:56PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:40:55PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > If that is it, then I believe git should "do the right thing" when
> > generating patches. I've noticed that it progressively sets the encoding
> > based on the minimum
Hi,
Quoting Andreas Enge (2016-02-14 16:47:10)
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote:
> > this is my first package, please be nice ;)
>
> we always are :-)
:)
> The package looks very nice, I only have a few minor comments.
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:56:22PM +010
Hello,
finally I tried out GuixSD on a spare machine, and I must say, I am impressed!
I have two questions concerning the artwork; I did a "guix pull" before
reconfiguring, so these should concern the current state:
- The logo on the grub screen has a checkerboard pattern in the background;
I t
PS: I forgot the magic words: Could you please send an updated patch?
Ah, and add a copyright line for yourself.
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote:
> this is my first package, please be nice ;)
we always are :-)
The package looks very nice, I only have a few minor comments.
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:56:22PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote:
> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA
* gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add new patch.
* gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (genometools): New package.
* gnu/packages/patches/genometools-fix-testsuite.patch: New file.
---
gnu-system.am | 1 +
gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm| 40 +
Hello,
this is my first package, please be nice ;) Thanks to Manolis for answering
all my questions :)
Cheers,
Justus
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 06:10:17PM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> > (native-inputs
> > `(("python-setuptools-scm" ,python-setuptools-scm)))
> >
> > (define-public python2-execnet
> > (package
> > (inherit (package-with-python2
> > (strip-python2-variant pytho
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:40:55PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> If that is it, then I believe git should "do the right thing" when
> generating patches. I've noticed that it progressively sets the encoding
> based on the minimum required to encode the characters in the patch.
The last line of your
Nils Gillmann writes:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:31:51 +0100
>> Nils Gillmann wrote:
>>
>>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> [...]
>>> [...]
>>> [...]
>>> [...]
>>> [...]
>>> [...]
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> But now as I did g
38 matches
Mail list logo
