On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 02:47:43AM +0100, tobias.geerinckx.r...@gmail.com wrote: > Hullo, > > It was pointed out to me that the current licence (‘gpl2+’) for > btrfs-progs is just wrong and should be ‘gpl2’ instead. > > I must have opened one of the few gpl2+-licenced files in the tarball > by sheer bad luck. Here is a patch to set things right.
Thanks for the report! I pushed a change that lists the handful of gpl2+ files and names both licenses. > > Kind regards, > > T G-R > > (I struggled to write a ‘GNU-style’ commit message for something so > trivial and probably went overboard. This can be fixed in a later > patch series.) >
