* gnu/packages/patches/guile-web.patch: New file.
* gnu-system.am: Add it
* gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-2.0): Add the patch.
---
gnu-system.am| 1 +
gnu/packages/guile.scm | 3 +-
gnu/packages/patches/guile-web.patch | 78 ++
Hi!
Finally support for offloading builds to other Guix machines has landed!
It’s still rough on the edges, but it does the job, and should allow us
to start having more than one machine (and one architecture) building
things. Yay!
It requires Guile 2.0.10 (not yet released) though, and is not b
* gnu/packages/fltk.scm: New file
* gnu-system.am: New file fltk.scm
---
gnu-system.am |1 +
gnu/packages/fltk.scm | 63 +
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/fltk.scm
diff --git a/gnu-system.am b/gnu-sys
* gnu/packages/xorg.scm (libxft): Propagate input libxrender.
---
gnu/packages/xorg.scm |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
index dfdd82c..c21ed63 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xorg.scm
@@ -1
* gnu/packages/maths.scm (octave gnuplot): New variables
---
gnu/packages/maths.scm | 88
1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/maths.scm b/gnu/packages/maths.scm
index 640d502..ffa2cd9 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/maths.scm
+++
Hi,
Sree Harsha Totakura writes:
> It has been known for a while that any access to /dev/shm fails inside
> chroot if the host system has /dev/shm symlinked to /run/shm.
>
> The suggested method to deal with this until now is to remove the
> symlink from the host system, create /dev/shm director
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:35:14PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> And what do we do for URIs in http:// or mirror://?
What is the particular problem? For ffmpeg, for instance, the uri reads
(uri (string-append "http://www.ffmpeg.org/releases/ffmpeg-";
version ".ta
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:51:08PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Do you have a way to reproduce it (command line + “will be downloaded” list)?
> I tried a few substitutions at random and everything went fine.
Now everything goes well for me, too. No idea what happened.
Andreas
"Thompson, David" writes:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Or just xiph.scm? Because not everything is a codec strictly speaking.
>
> I like this name best.
Sure, xiph.scm sounds good to me.
Mark
Hi,
It has been known for a while that any access to /dev/shm fails inside
chroot if the host system has /dev/shm symlinked to /run/shm.
The suggested method to deal with this until now is to remove the
symlink from the host system, create /dev/shm directory and mount a
tmpfs on it.
I spent some
Hi!
Attached the patch with the suggested changes.
Sree
On 01/22/2014 11:42 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> As you can see there are a bunch of conventions, but hopefully it will
> be easy to adjust and won’t be too much of a burden.
From 23dcddebb12c619e22dac20a6181dfb77df4c876 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:58:43AM -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Or just xiph.scm? Because not everything is a codec strictly speaking.
> I like this name best.
Done in 54ff0b7. Please correct any errors you find... (As I just restar
Hello,
Please find, following on from this, a further revision of the patch
for dmd's manual, taking into account Ludovic's feedback.
Best wishes,
Alex
* dmd.texi (Introduction): Rewrite for style and clarity.
---
dmd.texi | 53 +
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dmd.texi b/dmd.texi
index 841ce7c..a970894 100644
--- a/dmd.texi
+++ b/dmd.texi
@@ -78,24 +78,29 @@ t
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Or just xiph.scm? Because not everything is a codec strictly speaking.
I like this name best.
- Dave
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Andreas Enge writes:
>> Actually, it should go into oggvorbis.scm, where we put all xiph codecs.
>
> I think that module should be renamed. Maybe xiph-codecs.scm ?
Or just xiph.scm? Because not everything is a codec strictly speaking.
Ludo’.
Andreas Enge writes:
> Actually, it should go into oggvorbis.scm, where we put all xiph codecs.
I think that module should be renamed. Maybe xiph-codecs.scm ?
Mark
That would be really nice! Count me in.
Bas
On 22 January 2014 13:50, Cillian de Róiste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since there will be quite a few NixOS and Guix folks at FOSDEM it would be
> great to meet up. Is there some interest in arranging dinner / drinks on
> Saturday evening?
>
> Cheers,
> Cillian
Hi Ludo,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> Let me know if you think I should ba approaching this differently.
>
> I will comment on the first patch, but what specific points do you want
> to address more generally? Is it more about wording, structure, guiding
> the user? (I can see some of that in th
Alex Sassmannshausen skribis:
> * dmd.texi (Introduction): Rewrite for style and clarity.
Overall looks good to me!
A few comments below:
> --- a/dmd.texi
> +++ b/dmd.texi
> @@ -78,24 +78,28 @@ the GNU system.
>
> @cindex service manager
> This manual documents the @dfn{dmd} service manage
Hi!
Alex Sassmannshausen skribis:
> I'm assuming that dmd contributions go to the guix list for now.
Yep.
> Attached a patch introducing some changes to the dmd manual — the
> patch only covers the Introduction section for now as I wanted to
> submit something with my approach early to know wh
* dmd.texi (Introduction): Rewrite for style and clarity.
---
dmd.texi | 52
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dmd.texi b/dmd.texi
index 841ce7c..4e06e93 100644
--- a/dmd.texi
+++ b/dmd.texi
@@ -78,24 +78,28 @@ th
Hello,
I'm assuming that dmd contributions go to the guix list for now.
Attached a patch introducing some changes to the dmd manual — the
patch only covers the Introduction section for now as I wanted to
submit something with my approach early to know whether it is
acceptable.
As you can see it'
23 matches
Mail list logo
