"Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Or just xiph.scm?  Because not everything is a codec strictly speaking.
>
> I like this name best.

Sure, xiph.scm sounds good to me.

     Mark

Reply via email to