() Neil Jerram
() Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:04:43 +0100
Sorry that this reply is so late ... but no, there hasn't been anything
since what I posted.
No worries. Your patch inspired me to do some research...
And I see that you've since released a new
Guile-WWW with this included - thanks
Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> () Neil Jerram
> () Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:00:13 +
>
>I'm working on a project that needs a web data server, and I'd like to
>use Apache + mod_lisp + Guile for that.
>
>[extending Guile-WWW: background, rationale, etc]
>
>[patch]
>
> I'd like to add th
() Neil Jerram
() Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:00:13 +
I'm working on a project that needs a web data server, and I'd like to
use Apache + mod_lisp + Guile for that.
[extending Guile-WWW: background, rationale, etc]
[patch]
I'd like to add this support to Guile-WWW. Has there been any
Hi,
Neil Jerram writes:
>> Apart from the licensing, there is a good technical reason: separation allows
>> Guile-WWW to be used by other Guile versions. (I'm still playing w/ Guile
>> 1.4, for example.)
>
> That's fair enough, of course.
>
> Overall, I'd say it looks like the best thing for no
Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
>I note that Guile-WWW's license is GPLv3+, whereas the Guile
>distribution as a whole is LGPLv3+. I'm not sure if that's a problem or
>not; I think I remember hearing that there are already other pieces of
>code that came from guile-library and that have
() Neil Jerram
() Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:29:07 +
Would it really be stepping on their toes? AFAICT they only use Guile
for configuration, whereas Guile-WWW's purpose is to provide function to
Guile applications.
Serveez is a general protocol handling (big dishing loop around select(2)
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> I note that Guile-WWW's license is GPLv3+, whereas the Guile
>> distribution as a whole is LGPLv3+. I'm not sure if that's a problem or
>> not;
>
> It’s not a problem. It’s fine to have parts of the standard library
> under the LGPLv3+ and other parts un
Hello!
Neil Jerram writes:
> Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
[...]
>> On the subject of expansions and contractions (as they relate to Guile-WWW),
>> i've been thinking of moving the repo to savannah and looking for a co- (or
>> perhaps replacement) maintainer, to ensure its longevity and encourage
Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> After a quick skim of the patch, it seems to me the core modlisp support is
> rather straightforward. I like how you extended `big-dishing-loop'. Perhaps
> that can be pushed out even further so that the (Guile-WWW) user can define
> other protocols. We would run the
() Neil Jerram
() Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:00:13 +
Anyway, I attach my work in progress, for the sake of soliciting any
comments that people may have, as a patch against 2.27. Please note
that I'm not necessarily proposing _everything_ here for incorporation
into guile-www - e.g. I th
Hi all!
I'm working on a project that needs a web data server, and I'd like to
use Apache + mod_lisp + Guile for that.
I know that there is a mod_lisp_for_guile written by Alan Grover, but it
bothers me that our various bits of www function aren't better
integrated, and guile-www seems like the b
11 matches
Mail list logo
