very interesting.
Finally is our functions,at least one, for/bc compatible with R6RS? i can
not exactly figure it exactly, i see at leats identifier-syntax not in the
library index:
http://www.r6rs.org/final/html/r6rs-lib/r6rs-lib-Z-H-21.html#node_index_start
one day i will have to read the Dybvig
Le 04/09/2022 à 16:41, Damien Mattei a écrit :
yes in fact a lot of function related to syntax (datum->syntax, etc)
are not in R6RS and R7RS-small,
datum->syntax actually *is* R6RS, in the "libraries" document. See
http://www.r6rs.org/final/r6rs-lib.pdf page 55.
(It is not in R7RS small,
yes in fact a lot of function related to syntax (datum->syntax, etc) are
not in R6RS and R7RS-small,
i have to keep that in mind because i want to write a library that could be
portable between scheme implementation and that support curly-infix ,less
than a number of scheme that count with the fing
Le 04/09/2022 à 14:00, Damien Mattei a écrit :
yes very good
then break si not overwritten, using module, i do not know if modules
is finally standardised in R6RS, and in guile?
Guile supports R6RS libraries, but it's not the same as its traditional
use-modules/define-module forms.
htt
yes very good
then break si not overwritten, using module, i do not know if modules is
finally standardised in R6RS, and in guile?
a few problem with module i hope to fix it later but it works with your
example, not sure let/ec is standart?
i will continue later
Damien
On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 1
Le 04/09/2022 à 11:54, Damien Mattei a écrit :
i try to make a for with break and continue the way C language do it, i
works with break but if i add a continue feature i then loose the break
feature, here is my code:
(define-syntax for/bc
(lambda (stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
((kwd (i
