Le 04/09/2022 à 16:41, Damien Mattei a écrit :
yes in fact a lot of function related to syntax (datum->syntax, etc)
are not in R6RS and R7RS-small,
datum->syntax actually *is* R6RS, in the "libraries" document. See
http://www.r6rs.org/final/r6rs-lib.pdf page 55.
(It is not in R7RS small, since R7RS small doesn't even have syntax-case.)
i have to keep that in mind because i want to write a library that
could be portable between scheme implementation and that support
curly-infix ,less than a number of scheme that count with the fingers
of an hand ,at the end.... :-) but 'for was a disgression,i know
'while of guile, again not standard...
Regards,
Damien
On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 2:40 PM Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr> wrote:
Le 04/09/2022 à 14:00, Damien Mattei a écrit :
> yes very good
> then break si not overwritten, using module, i do not know if
modules
> is finally standardised in R6RS, and in guile?
Guile supports R6RS libraries, but it's not the same as its
traditional
use-modules/define-module forms.
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R6RS-Libraries.html
But you're going to have a much more pressing problem with
standardization: syntax parameters are not standard. So you're a bit
stuck there.
> a few problem with module i hope to fix it later but it works with
> your example, not sure let/ec is standart?
let/ec is not standard, but exceptions are. See section 7 of the
libraries document of R6RS:
http://www.r6rs.org/final/r6rs-lib.pdf
Best,
Jean
