yes in fact a lot of function related to syntax (datum->syntax, etc) are not in R6RS and R7RS-small, i have to keep that in mind because i want to write a library that could be portable between scheme implementation and that support curly-infix ,less than a number of scheme that count with the fingers of an hand ,at the end.... :-) but 'for was a disgression,i know 'while of guile, again not standard...
Regards, Damien On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 2:40 PM Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr> wrote: > > > Le 04/09/2022 à 14:00, Damien Mattei a écrit : > > yes very good > > then break si not overwritten, using module, i do not know if modules > > is finally standardised in R6RS, and in guile? > > > > Guile supports R6RS libraries, but it's not the same as its traditional > use-modules/define-module forms. > > https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R6RS-Libraries.html > > But you're going to have a much more pressing problem with > standardization: syntax parameters are not standard. So you're a bit > stuck there. > > > > > a few problem with module i hope to fix it later but it works with > > your example, not sure let/ec is standart? > > > let/ec is not standard, but exceptions are. See section 7 of the > libraries document of R6RS: > > http://www.r6rs.org/final/r6rs-lib.pdf > > Best, > Jean > >
